Merritt Vs Dillard

Decent Essays
The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo, “using the same legal standard as the district court.” Merritt v. Dillard Paper Co., 120 F.3d 1181, 1184 (11th Cir. 1997). To win on a motion for summary judgment, the movant only needs to show that there is no genuine dispute of material fact and that they are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). While the Court must view inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, “this does not lessen the burden of the non-moving party in any way.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1528 (11th Cir. 1987). Thus, the nonmovant still bears the burden of providing “sufficient evidence” for every element she must prove. Id. (Citing

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    1. Goods versus Services. A. ISSUE: Discuss fully whether the contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of goods or the sale of serv¬ices. The contract between the Palermos and Colorado Carpet was primarily for the sale of services because the Palermos orally agreed to the purchase and installation of the carpet.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court denominated direct, and requested the instance of Betts v. Brady, 316 U.S. 455 to be rethought being referred to of regardless of whether it ought to be reexamined keeping in mind the cessation goal to concede a…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bordenkecher Case Summary

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    See Worsham v. Ehrlich, 181 Md. App. 711, 722 (2008). Therefore, if a court considers materials outside the pleadings, the motion to dismiss is converted to a motion for summary judgment. D’Aoust v. Diamond, 424 Md. 549, 573 (2012). Summary judgment should only be entered “if the motion and response show that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that the party in whose favor judgment…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Parol Evidence Rule

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wiencek further argues that the trial court erred by considering “parol evidence to vary the effective date of the [B108 agreement] and to controvert the integration clause.” CHH, for its part, avers that the admission of parol evidence was proper because it was offered to determine whether the contract was effective. We hold that the circuit court did not violate the parole evidence rule because extrinsic evidence was not offered to add or modify any terms to the B108 agreement. Generally, parol or extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary the terms of an integrated contract.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court held that the district court erred when it relied on whether a manager's con- duct seriously affected plaintiff worker's psychological well being or led her to suffer injury. The court held that while Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. ß 2000e-2(a)(1) barred conduct that would seriously affect a reasonable person's psychological well being, the statute was not limited to such conduct. The court held that as long as the environment would reasonably be perceived and was perceived as hostile or abusive, there was no need for it also to be psychologi- cally injurious. The court found that psychological harm could be taken into account, but was not required by the statute. In Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., the Court…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Courts in Nevada have routinely established that, “summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and no genuine issue of material fact remains for trial;" properly supported factual allegations of the party opposing summary judgment must be accepted as true.” Perez v. Las Vegas Med. Ctr., 107 Nev. 1, 805 P.2d 589 (1991). ARGUMENT Daily Mirror was well within its rights to terminate Ms. Cohen’s employment at any time and for any reason it felt compelled to do so as she was an at-will employee. Daily Mirror never entered into any express employment contract with Ms. Cohen.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT BECAUSE THE GOODS PROVIDED BY BOTH PARTIES ARE DIRECTLY RELATED AND BOTH PARTIES CONSUMERS ARE DIRECTLY RELATED. The related goods Frisch factor should favor Lamborghini because Lamborghini and AEV’s goods and consumers are related. Lamborghini’s goods are related because both goods are high performance vehicles whose prices overlap and it is possible that one company could be associated or sponsored with the other.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fairness Vs Mediation

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Can an argument be made that alternative dispute resolution diminishes our constitutional rights to a fair trial? Compare and contrast the fairness between a civil trial court decision and a decision reached by a single mediator in a binding mediation. The fairness of a civil trial decision and a mediation decision has many differences, such as who makes the decision and whether or not there is a right of appeal. The fairness of a civil trial decision includes a judge, jury, a winner and a loser.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Summary Judgment

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    II. Standard for Summary Judgment Rule 56 of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure governs the standard for summary judgment. The rule states, “The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Appellant Procedure Essay

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The following directions were made: 66. The parties to exchange any additional evidence on which they seek to rely by 20th January 2015, this is to include any witness statements from any witness, including the defendant himself; and:- 67. The parties are prohibited from relying on any evidence not already served or served in accordance with paragraph 1 of these directions, without the permission of the…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Courts held that an expansion of the right to counsel would intrude upon a portion of the prosecutor's preparation interviews with witnesses, and was vehemently opposed to such a result, which concluded that the adversary process was sufficient to expose any possible defects in photographic identification procedures. (Salisbury,…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Then the Magistrate would decide based on the victim's testimony in addition to any circumstantial…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Argument for Tangible Detriment: The District court improperly granted summary judgment as a reasonable jury could find that Prufrock suffered a tangible detriment when he was denied tutoring and received the worst English grade of his college career after he rejected Crewel 's offer to "take care of things" for him if he was "a good boy".(DEP.) To determine whether plaintiff suffered a tangible detriment, courts consider whether 1) plaintiff suffered a material loss and 2) the loss resulted from plaintiff 's rejection of advances. (Johnson) Courts have defined a material loss as an adverse change to a crucial aspect of the employment or educational experience. See e.g., Bowman v. Shawnee, 220 F.3d 456, 461-462 (6th Cir. 2000);…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    RUVINI KAPURUBANDARA, ID 18540895 (word count 1257 only the answer ) ANSWER QUESTION 1 : Facts Arabella Lim is an architect Had provided designs drawings and specification that desings was approved by the wonder council for the balcony on the first floor of the wonder wood town hall trivia night was held on the first floor magistrate snape heavily intoxicate was leaning against the balcony balcony began to give way magistrate snape fekk to the ground were broken his legs, suffered injuries to his spine Issue : Did Lim breach the duty of care he owed to magistrate snape ? Rules : that the plaintiff had a reasonable foreseeability to owe for the defendant ; Chapman v Hearse that the proximity of relationship to the defendant by…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case A: Adidas America Inc. vs. Sketchers USA Inc. Background On September 14th, 2015, Plaintiff A (Plaintiff Adidas America Inc.) filed a complaint of trademark infringement, trade dress infringement, unfair competition, deceptive trade practices and trademark and trade dress dilution, against Defendant S (Sketchers USA Inc.). Plaintiff A put forward such claims due to the assertion of belief that throughout the years, Defendant S had knowingly and continuously produced shoes designs which possessed jarringly similar to those of trademarked signature designs produced by Plaintiff A. Plaintiff A and Defendant S are known to have a long ongoing vendetta that stems from the infamous 1994 Civil Suit and 1995 Settlement Agreement. The 1994 Civil Suit was filed for the infringement of Defendant’s Karl Kani footwear design which was the first to infringe Plaintiff A’s…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays