Protestant Work Ethic And The Spirit Of Capitalism Analysis

Improved Essays
Exam #3

Max Weber a sociologist that was engaged with social life and sought to gain objective understanding on what guides social action. His work The Protestant Work Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, is to this day highly regarded as one of the most influential sociological writings. In his writings it was through social, rational actions where the commands or demands of society compel individuals to follow a line of conduct.
Max Weber deviated from Karl Marx in three major forms, firstly in that no intrinsic law was the development of social life; secondly not one single structure could be attributed to the development of societies; third, capitalism was not at fault for the diminishing creativity rather extreme rationalization. Through
…show more content…
An individual “calling” is not to live in fear of God, but rather what an individual is doing is in glorification of God. Every individual thus has a different calling, where they dedicate oneself towards work. In turn based on how the individual views their circumstances is how they evaluate their chances of attaining eternal salvation. Through this individual calling members of society gain an understanding of their place within society, and how it was their own work that had echoing effects. In this individual “calling” it guides an individual to seek his place within society, and to view the circumstances around him as a guide of their place in society. The Spirit of capitalism is being justified through these ideas of a “calling” of work. Protestants worked to maintain a lifestyle of living that aligned with the work they were doing (Appelrouth and Edles 2016). This is a guideline of modern day capitalism in that it attributes the success of the individual, to the individuals work and stratifies based on the work an individual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Misael Sanchez World of Business Sept. 25, 2017 “Money, Greed, and God” by Jay W. Richards Chapters 1& 2 Analysis “Money, Greed, and god” Chapters One & Two Analysis” I perpetually rest assure that Capitalism is selfish and corrupt. Contemplating that greed hurts the poor and helps the rich, that greed is all about the desire for money and power. After reading the introduction and chapters one and two of Jay W. Richar ds book “Money, Greed and God: Why Capitalism is the Solution “, Richard certainly grasps my consideration and leads me towards to considering that a capitalistic economy is not a deficient concept after all and that a “good Christian can be, indeed should be, a good capitalist”. The author seems to structure the book…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . The three main sociological perspective are: Structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. Structural functionalism (Macro) is based largely on the works of George Herbert. According to functionalism, society is a system of interconnected parts that work together to maintain a state of balance and social equilibrium. Conflict theory (Macro) is a theory propounded by Karl Marx that claims society is in a state of consistent conflict due to competition for limited sources.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Firstly, the historiography of the subject will be examined. The initial idea that large shifts in attitudes towards the supernatural resulting from the Reformation were presented by Max Weber in his work The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Weber argued that the Reformation was part of some great process, where Protestantism rejected sacramental magic and instead brought about a rationalisation and intellectualisation of the world where incorporeal forces no longer existed in everyday life. He termed this process as the “disenchantment of the world”, a phrase borrowed from Friedrich Schiller. Weber argued that the Reformation with its emphasis on individual vocation, and in particular the canon of predestination, created the ideal ideological state for a wide sweep in methodical rationalisation and thus creating the modernisation.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Weber were great sociologists, but they had entirely different concepts when it comes to sociology. Marx had the socialist perspective when it came to sociology. He believed that the relationship between people is based on how much money that a person makes. And he believed that the middle class or as he called it the “working Class” has to ban together and rise up to revolt against the upper class.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The period of industrialization influenced the three classical sociological theorists, Marx, Durkheim and Weber. Marx thought of industrialization in the most negative of ways compared to the other sociological theorists. With the rise of industrialization, the social classes changed to who was related to the mean of production, so the owners of the factories and machinery were called the bourgeois, who had more power than the proletariat, those working in the factories, creating the product. With this class distinction, Marx believed that it would lead to problems and conflict between the classes, because each class had their own interest, for instance, the bourgeoisie might be more interested in creating a product faster and cheaper, while…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociological Theories

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Briefly contrast two theories of the ruling class covered in week 9. The two theories discussed were Marxist theory and Weber’s theory. Marxist theory consist of two main classes: the proletariat and bourgeois. Marxist theory explains how someone’s class is determined based on their role, either the worker or the capitalist.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Max Weber’s key concept was rationalization. This refers to the eradication of mystery and emotion from everyday life and their replacement by rational calculation and control. This essay will discuss Weber’s contribution towards sociology in terms of rationalization and his attribution to ‘The Protestant Ethic’. It will introduce Weber’s key approaches, such as social theory, rationalization in regards to modern society, bureaucracy, the ideal type and a contemporary example of rationalization. Furthermore, capitalism will be discussed, in order to depict Weber’s theories in comparison to Marx’s.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dual Calling of Christians. Christians have two callings, one to Christ to be part of his body, and one to the world as citizens, neighbors, co-workers, etc. This duality is shown in Romans 13:1-7 where Paul reminds everyone to place themselves under government authority while reminding them that all authority comes from God. Each of these areas has its own government and uses distinct ends and means when serving that unit. There is a distinction between heavenly things and earthly things, and between righteousness before God and righteousness before fellow humans.…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Both Weber and Foucault conceptualised power and domination in different ways. Weber saw power in terms of authority that emanated and descended from above via powerful agents whereas Foucault saw power as an agentless horizontal force (Rudolph, 2006, p. 3). The differences between the three social theorists and their respected theories is that Marx focuses on economic power, particularly social and economic relationships and how it contributed to production. It was Marx’s belief that the ideal achievement of socialism led to equality and liberation. Weber contrasts to Marx by concentrating on status and rationalisation, believing that Marxism meant that the state had too much control and it potentially could lead to loss of freedoms for the individual.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Max Weber’s arguably most influential work, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber argues that a specific religious ethic shaped how Capitalism spread across the globe and transitioned into the modern age. Influenced by the idea of the ‘calling’ or one’s worldly task determined by God (39), this ethic actually incentivized people to work more in their mundane, secular occupations in order to accumulate physical wealth as an indication of God’s favor. Overall, this essay will be a self-discussion of the various ideas Weber introduces as well as other topics that caught my attention while reading his work. One aspect I like about Weber is his approach to understand modern Capitalism as a product of religion.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    9. Which do you think is more accurate the pluralist view or the majoritarian view? (Which can stop police brutality?) I think the pluralist view is more accurate when it comes to stopping police brutality. I think this because the pluralist view conveys that democracy comes from openness of the system to group interests, and competition, but not as a result of mass participation.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Durkheim 's explanation of social changes differ because both of their theories have differences on the essential makeup of modern society. They were both concerned with the emergence of modern society and the division of labor. However for Marx a revolution was necessary for change and for Durkheim was interested in improving society not removing the capitalist social construct. Social change from Marx focus mainly on economics Marx theory looked at how we produced and exchanged goods in order to survive and that shaped how people related to each other.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He helped give an idea of what really happens within a society based upon social hierarchy between the classes. Max Weber was German scientist that used the industrial revolution and the changes it brought for his viewpoint on the subject. He did not believe that economy was the main source of social change. He believed in a more scientific approach instead of it based on values. Weber also believed that bureaucracy instead of class should determine the relationship between people and…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, Marx and Weber views of social stratification on present day concerns that affect our lives. Despite bearing some minor similarities, the difference between Marx and Weber are pronounced. For Karl Marx, class reflected society and production. Marx looked at how the material production is socially organized.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays