Compare And Contrast Marx And Weber View Of Social Stratification

Improved Essays
Social stratification is everywhere, even in different forms of societies, such as capitalist, communist or mixed. Social stratification can be understood as a system that a society ranks categories of people in hierarchy. A person social class in based on births and achievements in life and an individual position within class structure shows social status. Social stratification is a society that ranks people and Marx and Weber both have different ways of how they view social stratification. This essay will look at both Marx view of social stratification which is bourgeoisie and proletariat and Weber view of social stratification which is class, standë/status, and party/power. In addition, Marx and Weber views of social stratification on present day concerns that affect our lives. Despite bearing some minor similarities, the difference between Marx and Weber are pronounced.
For Karl Marx, class reflected society and production. Marx looked at how the material production is socially organized. It is characterized by the relations of economic subordination and domination. Marx looked at society and division of labour and finds that two different class that bring differences
…show more content…
Weber disagreed with some of Marx’s theories. Weber did not believe in worker’s revolution, but he looked at a broader conception of class, power and it outcomes, also power controls different types of resources. Kerbo (2006) acknowledges for Weber, he recognized that human are divided, but not only by economic ownership, but occupational skills, status and organization power, which are class, standë/status, and party/power. Weber used the two forms of economic division that was under class and based on the ownership and occupational skill. Kerbo (2006) explains that Weber acknowledges that people are divided by honour, status, or prestige that is held to value system and political

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Weber were great sociologists, but they had entirely different concepts when it comes to sociology. Marx had the socialist perspective when it came to sociology. He believed that the relationship between people is based on how much money that a person makes. And he believed that the middle class or as he called it the “working Class” has to ban together and rise up to revolt against the upper class.…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, in relation to another piece of research about underclass, Journals of youth for example, (Shildrick, T. et al, 2009: 457) referred to Marx claiming “He understood that forces of global, corporate capital shape social class…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Class Contradictions in the Communist Manifesto Marxist socialism was designed with the intention of creating a utopia; unfortunately, it turned into one of the greatest political dividing forces the world has seen, but it also encapsulated all the frustration and discrimination the working class suffered through. Marx desired a society with no class or property, and since the working class was the lowest class on the social ladder, this classless society appealed greatly to them. They would be the only class to gain from it, while the other classes would only lose status. Marx viewed class as a natural part of human society, and it was necessary for the level of human development achieved in the Industrial Revolution. The bourgeois had served…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx talks about his narrative about how we got this class divide that we have present today. Broadly speaking for Marx, the Bourgeoisie comes from the middle ages. Back historically, the class in power was the feudal class and the bourgeoisie started to gain power when they became the merchants. They were the ones who were using this system of the new market. They used trade and industry in a way that feudal lords did not.…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociologists use social stratification to describe inequalities among individuals within societies (Edison, 2006). “By the early twentieth century, German society was divided into more or less clear-cut classes. Industrial workers included both the skilled and the unskilled… The middle classes included small businessmen and independent members of the trades, white-collar employees, professionals, and civil servants. Finally, the upper or upper middle classes consisted of industrialists, financiers, high government officials, and large landowners, among others” (Edison, 2006).…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Spanish colonial territories, in the so-called 'elections,' as well as in the so-called 'revolutions,' what was at stake was always the state bread-basket from which the victors wished to be fed”(Panarchy.org, 2018). Marx indicated that there could be a big possibility for capitalists to be competitive with each other, because they all probably wanted to succeed, so they could also ruin the other capitalist by reducing the price of their merchandise or their services as well. With the purpose of selling the merchandise in low prices but without lowering the profit. And so the competition would not just be around the capitalist but also, at the workers class as well. For weber, there were differences in the way that people think, and so he focused in three aspects: rationalization, bureaucracy and social…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He divided the population into two groups: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The bourgeoisie was the ruling class; they own the means of production and, because of this, control the people. The proletariat operates the means of production, and is controlled by the bourgeoisie. Marx claimed that everyone fit into one of these groups. Marx’s two social classes are very apparent in Fahrenheit 451’s society.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The constant change in capitalism, often affects those who need to survive. This causes a conflict between the wealthy and the poor, which feeds into Marx’s idea of social conflict. His intention is all about creating a separation of capitalism and proletariats.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sociological Research

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marx believes that conflict is the beginning of society and that it must exist for society to exist. He looks closely at the struggle and conflict within society between two opposing classes. The Bourgeoisie, the big business owners, and the Proletariat, people who have something to sell. They both depend on each other to function. Marxism explains social stratification as society based on inequality of distribution of production.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s society necessities are no longer produce for one’s self rather for everyone else. Karl Marx theory looks at the historical materialism requirements of mode of production that humans use to construct these necessities or the economics of producing the necessities of life(pg 93). He sees that people enter into an occupation or social role forcefully or sometimes willingly, in the hopes of survival. Karl Marxs is pointing out, the relationship of people in lower class does all the hard work, while someone in a upper class collects the rewards because they own the mean of production such as land or factories and have people from lower class work on those grounds.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx presented Marxism as a way of understanding class divisions in the world that were based on the emphasis on materialism. Marx proposed a society without money or class divisions, diminishing the idea of materialism and capitalism, instead offering that equality in a society is based on how a society is run. Marx’s claims stemmed from an ideological perspective that individuals are more inclined to their wants instead of their needs, he offers that a society must work in a way where not just one individual but an entire society must give what they can to their state or government and take what they need not what they want. Doing this, Marx argues, will remove class conflict and monetary disparities. Marx idealized a utopia of equality for all, not just a certain few.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx and Weber are some of the most influential thinkers within sociology, their work helped to define and explain a phenomenon that was drastically altering the fabric of 18th and 19th century Europe, Capitalism. In trying to define what capitalism was both sociologists looked for an explanation in its origins, both seeing similar yet ultimately very radically different factors contributing to the origins of Capitalism in feudal Europe. Marx with his ‘scientific’ approach (which some argue only appears in his later works, for example Das Kapital), attempting to quantify the origins of capitalism with scientifically testable data (Marx really was the first to do this within the field of sociology), and Weber with his more psycho-analitical…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During feudalism there was multiple levels of social stratification. However, under the burgeoning new system, capitalism, there was only two social, and economic groups – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. Marx summed…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays