Albert J. Beveridge's 'The Taste Of Empire'

Improved Essays
After the Spanish-American War, the United States had possession of the Philippines. This created a divide in the United States about whether to keep the Philippines for its commercial value or to allow the Philippines to become independent. The purpose of the document, The Taste of Empire by Albert J. Beveridge, is to write a disquisition on how essential it is for America to monopolize the Philippines and continue to preserve it. He addresses to the audience of labourers and farmers to show the benefits those groups would enjoy, such as; better wages, and higher prices for produce. He states how America would become the peacekeeper in trade since they are largely involved, and how America would help out the little places, like the Philippines, greatly. That it …show more content…
He exclaims how Americans need to stand by and encourage the President of God’s chosen people. Beveridge’s idea of freedom is that it is a wonderful thing which needs to be spread throughout and around the world, and that we are withholding this fantastic thing from other countries. Citizenship is something Beveridge believes to become a huge benefit if we kept the Philippines. He states that, in America, it will help out workers and farmers, and outside of America, it will help smaller places of trade expand. Charles Eliot Norton, who wrote The Desertion of Ideals, to show how America is deserting what its original ideals were. He strongly believes that America was strong and had validity, but now America is selfish. Norton shows that he disapproves keeping the Philippines, and that the men who also believe in this are not given any credit. In the very first line of The Desertion of Ideals, Norton is described as one of the most grief stricken of all patriotic citizens about the participation of the Spanish-American war, and about the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Equally important was the rationale of easier trade and business opportunities in Asia because of the annexation. Once again, it is unrighteous to own people in order to do business with them. All in all, the United States as a major power did not have the right to exploit the Philippines through the excuses of Christianity, business opportunities, and protecting takeover by other countries. The United States in fact used it for their own benefit, mostly to increase their naval…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1898 there was a war with Spain which was because of how they treated the Cuban’s by the Spanish masters. The United States luckily had a lot of power around the whole world. The Filipino insurgents have always tried to attack the Spanish to have independence for many years which they wouldn’t receive it. They believed that the Americans might free them from the Spanish. Since America won the war they had three choices they had to make which was to give the Philippines independence, give the islands back to Spain, or annex the Philippines.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anglo-Saxonism DBQ

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beveridge uses the perspective of sociology to support the annexation of the Philippines during a campaign speech he says, “We govern our children without their consent…. Would not the people of the Philippines prefer the just, human, civilizing government of this republic to the savage, bloody (Spanish) rule”. (Doc B) this just goes to show how the Americans thought of the Filipinas, Beveridge compares them to the children of our nation in the way that they cannot take care of themselves that is why adults take care of them. Beverridges argument supporting the annexation of the Philippines was the right thing to do because during this stretch of time he, and many others believed that non white people where inferior to all whites and that we needed to step in and take care of them like our own…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. The Spanish-American War in the Caribbean Sea contains a lot of bodies of water surrounding islands and lands, which shows that were many resources available in the Caribbean Sea. There is the Windward, Leewards, Cayman Islands and the Bahamas. There is the Atlantic Ocean that is surrounded by the countries such as Dominican Republic and Puerto Rico.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You conclude that this racial vision of imperial nation-building collided with U.S. nativist efforts to insulate the United States from its colonies, even at the cost of Philippine…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He states the the United States does not wish to take over foreign countries, but to simply lend a helping hand where is needed. Upon a country becoming uncivilized, America will interfere until all disputes are settled and the country can maintain itself without our assistance, also known as “police power (Document F).” The sole purpose of the help given by the United States is to ensure that foreign countries remain stable and prosperous to avoid abuse of the people and catastrophe. On the other hand, not everyone sought it fit for America to be putting so much attention on foreign affairs. These people were known as the Anti-imperialists.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He sought to justify this verdict by arguing that the Filipinos were uneducated and uncivil, and that it was America’s right and duty to “Christianise” them (Document 3). McKinley proclaimed this to a church delegation, probably occupied by a majority of white Anglo-Saxon protestant men and women, as they are most likely to support his motivation and Christian initiative (Intended Audience, Document 3). This showed the heavy emphasis American’s national identity at that time placed on Christianity. Future President Theodore Roosevelt also upheld the decision to annex the Philippines, using the reasoning that if America were not to take up leadership after Spanish rule, their government would descend into anarchy (Document 5). As well as being a strong appeal to the American ideal of democracy, the language he uses in the speech that proclaims these ideals reinforces what would later be known as his “speak softly and carry a big stick” attitude towards foreign policy.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The U.S. plays a fundamental role in the international order reinforcing, shaping and defining, and institutions around the world.7 (NSS, p.23) U.S. participation in numerous international partnerships, institutions, organizations and alliances establishes the foundation for a wide-range of global collaborations.8 (NSS, p.23) The plan stipulates continued participation in the United Nations (UN), while exhibiting adherence to multilateral treaties stressed by resource demands.9 (NSS, p.23) In rebalancing U.S. interests to the Asia-Pacific, multilateral nation-state involvement includes the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (ASEAN) and participation in the Tran-Pacific Partnership (TPP) lowering trade barriers with Pacific Rim nations.10 (NSS, p.17) U.S. strategic intent includes: strengthening European Union (EU) relationships, offering an ambitious Transatlantic Trade Investment Partnership (T-TIP) and sustained participation in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), as well as recommitment to Article 5 membership support.11 (NSS p.25)…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    American Imperialism Dbq

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In a speech in early 1899, when debate was raging over what the United States should do with the Philippines, Congressman George Hoar made the argument that the constitution does not give the United States the right to rule people in order to “civilize them,” and doing this against that people’s own interests went against the text and the spirit of the document, and the founding principles of the United States. Hoar also argued against the claim that holding on to the Philippines was for the Filipinos’ benefit: The people there have got a government, with courts and judges, better than those of the people of Cuba, who, it was said, had a right to self-government, collecting their customs; and it is proposed to turn your guns on them, and say, “We think that our notion of government is better than the notion you have got…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When talking about the dilemma concerning the subjugation of the Philippines, President McKinley said that giving the Philippines back to Spain was not an option because it was cowardly and dishonorable. Henry Cabot Lodge also displayed nationalism in his article written in 1865. He wrote about how Washington “saw, with prophetic vision... the true course for the American people...stretching from the Blue Ridge to the Pacific Ocean”(Doc B). Lodge also stated that from the Rio Grande to the Arctic Ocean there should only be one country, the United States.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aguinaldo Vs Beveridge

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aguinaldo then states that the United States went about conquering the Philippines the wrong way, to conquer the Philippines “you must begin by conquering the hearts of the Philippine people. ”4 Furthermore, Aguinaldo states that if the United States were honest and ethical they could have led the Philippines with ease and had full cooperation. Admiral Dewey, a friend of the Filipino people was able to observe the true brilliance “of the Philippine people”4 and if only he “had been left alone”4…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The writer’s intentions in this piece can be perceived as strong and well said through his level of certainty in the knowledge he had of how badly the American people had fallen. The suffered a moral and ethical fall due to them becoming the aggressor, after they had suffered and knew so much pain from their experience being under the rule of Great Britain. As a result of what happened to them they created a system of values that afforded rights to those who needed them and by taking control of other countries in a way that paralleled what they had gone through, it appeared as though they had forgotten what the constitution truly stood for. This behavior goes to show how little things have changed as people have and continue to be human and make the exact same mistakes they have always…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Washington is trying to explain through this is that there is no point for the United States to become involved in European wars and general affairs because it does not immediately affect them. This reduces the chances of the United States being called to fight for a country when they have very little to offer, with no navy and a minimal militia. However, because the United States would still be friendly with other countries, they would have time to grow and develop both the unstable economy and work on strengthening the military resources. This plan was an efficient idea for what the developing country should do in order to be able to compete against the European…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism is not a good policy for the United States as it discredited our reputation as an advocate for democracy. In Mark Twain 's essay ‘To the Person Sitting in the Darkness’ he talks about how our actions in Cuba were “honorable and righteous.” But yet our actions in the Philippines had affected our reputation as a proponent for democracy. The United States actions in Cuba were honorable as we were advocating for democracy we wanted to help the unstable country prosper, while as the United States actions in the Philippines were not honorable as it was barbaric, savage-like and brutal. What is going unsaid in this essay by Mark Twain is why are we going against our ideals, are we not proponents for democracy?…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Be American,” Carlos Bulosan reveals the lack of choice a Filipino had at the time through the story of someone’s cousin, Consorcio, and his struggle to gain citizenship in America. Bulosan’s short story shares this idea of no choice with a political cartoon known as “What Will He Do,” which depicts President McKinley deciding whether or not to keep the Philippines or “send them to Spain” while the globe watches for his decision. Through the visual of President McKinley making a decision for the Philippines, the political cartoon “What Will He Do,” argues the Philippines are deprived of choice. “Be American” mirrors this argument by linking the Consorcio and his cousin to the idea of lack of choice.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics