Humanitarianism Dbq Analysis

Improved Essays
The United States had a long tradition of expansion across the continent, but by the late 1800s, people started urging the U.S to start expanding overseas, following European’s model of imperialism. America’s actions in Cuba and the Philippines were the first steps in its quest to build an overseas empire. Many people say that for a complete explanation of U.S. actions in the 1890s, one would have to give equal weight to four motives: racism, nationalism, commercialism, and humanitarianism. However, humanitarianism was not a major cause of U.S’s actions in Cuba and the Philippines. The goal for the U.S was not to help people’s lives in those countries, but rather for commercialist, nationalist and racist reasons.
Racism was a major contributor
…show more content…
When talking about the dilemma concerning the subjugation of the Philippines, President McKinley said that giving the Philippines back to Spain was not an option because it was cowardly and dishonorable. Henry Cabot Lodge also displayed nationalism in his article written in 1865. He wrote about how Washington “saw, with prophetic vision...the true course for the American people...stretching from the Blue Ridge to the Pacific Ocean”(Doc B). Lodge also stated that from the Rio Grande to the Arctic Ocean there should only be one country, the United States. This feeling of national pride lead to many people voicing their thoughts that the U.S should take control of what is “rightfully theirs” and pursue the Manifest Destiny. They did not think about how they would affect the natives of the countries at …show more content…
Once again, Henry Cabot Lodge was one of the main leaders in pushing for advantages in commerce. He wrote that, “In the interest of our commerce...we should build the Nicaragua Canal...we should control the Hawaiian Islands and maintain our influence in Samoa”(Doc B). He also wrote about Cuba, saying, “the island of Cuba, still sparsely settled and of almost unbounded fertility will become to us a necessity”(Doc B). This shows how the first thing that jumped to people’s minds when discussing a mostly uninhabited island was commerce and how the U.S could take advantage of it. Many Americans believed that as the U.S dominated more countries, foreign trade would grow, resulting in a better economy for the country. Not many people thought of helping others at that time

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Teddy Roosevelt and William Mckinley were supporters of the idea that the U.S had no choice but to annex the Philippines. In Albert J. Beveridge, “The March of the Flag” campaign speech comments that if we did not take over the Philippines, Germany, England, and Japan would have consumed them for themselves (paragraph 3). Religious reasons also played a role in validating the annexation. For instance, GOD said so (“manifest destiny”). On the contrary, the Filipinos were already a Christian group of people.…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Imperialist League is against annexing the Philippines because it is morally wrong. Abraham Lincoln…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political leaders such as President William McKinley made accusations that after they "prayed to Almighty God for light and guidance (Doc 3)" it was revealed that the U.S must annex the Philippines in order to "educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them...by God's grace (Doc 3). " Politicians, in need to unify American…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the years of 1895-1920, America had started to move towards the idea of getting involved with foreign places. With the closing of the frontier, America had started to search for a type of ‘new frontier’ that they could conquer. The factor most important in driving American foreign policy in this time was self-interest. While idealism played a role when America felt the need to help foreign countries, it was ultimately self-interest that led America to take actions in foreign policy. Self- interest is shown when Senator Albert J. Beveridge claims in a speech that America was in need for new markets to get new resources from and to sell to for more trade.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The United States has always considered itself a shining city on a hill, a place that makes the rest of the world better. This is the narrative that many Americans have been sold, that whenever the United States intervenes, it is always for the better of not only that country, but the rest of the world. In spite of this narrative, the United States has not always had the best intentions, and many of their interventions have left lives and countries in ruin. Many of the darker parts of American interventionism come to bear in the book Empire’s Workshop by Greg Grandin, which discusses American imperialism in Latin America. Despite the fact that this book assumes a certain level of expertise on United States policy in Latin America, it is still…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that before America looked to expand, it should solve its internal issues. During 1899, wars in the Philippines took attention from the homeland, and people such as Anti-Imperialists did not concur with the decision to continue this war (Document D). In the end, though, the decision of the majority was to attempt to expand, or assist foreign…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    European Imperialism DBQ

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the first half of the twentieth century, the economic, political, ideological aspects all contributed to the skyrocketing and widespread imperialism, galvanizing developed countries to seek for more lands beyond the mainlands. However, the reasons are not isolated. The factor of economic pursuit, political ambitions, and ideological considerations were inter-connected, together strengthening the determination to expand territories. To begin with, the economic pursuit in the land overseas was predominant.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Manifest Destiny can be described as a U.S expansion that America had to expand their territory west. After independence had been conquered in the Revolution and then again in the War of 1812, a strong sense of nationalism was spread across the nation and demanded more land and opportunity. This westward expansion was also sparked by the Second Great Awakening where many settlers claimed that God called personally for the growth of the nation (UShist)These same settlers didn’t see fit of Natives in this vision and even labeled them as heathens. As a result of this derogatory label on the Natives and the belief that America had to continue to expand, many of the Native Americans were forced from their land. The United States justified this…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imperialism Dbq

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the 1890s and early 1900s, America, which had previously kept to itself, began expanding and attempting to take over smaller nations such as Hawaii, Panama, Cuba, and the Philippines. Many people supported this practice of imperialism, however, many also disagreed with it. The United States should have remained isolationist because it had internal issues to fix and imperializing contradicted democratic values. The first reason that America should not have sought to gain control of colonies is that it had its own problems to worry about.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Mid 1840’s a man by the name of James Polk took office as the United States President, and creating of the term COIL, promised to conquer, and keep California, and Oregon, introduce an independent treasury, and lower tariff rules. Manifest Destiny was a term used during these times where people thought that America should rule from sea to shining sea. Many educated Americans disapproved of such a journey, and wrote lots about reasons why it hurt America more than fulfilling suppositions. Although Manifest Destiny was seen as positive action towards helping America, it really was not in America’s best interest because it violates the Declaration of Independence, Expands the boundaries of slavery, and provoked a war with Mexico. To start off, the Declaration of Independence was a piece of work written by America's founding fathers that no other country…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Louisiana Purchase was a land deal in 1803 made between France and the United States that resulted in America expanding further into the New World and doubling their land size. This real estate deal resulted in the mass acquisition of land made under Jefferson’s presidency and later fueled Polk into wanting to expand further through the mid-19th-century idea of Manifest Destiny. This idea, made by John L. O 'Sullivan, was that it is America’s god-given right to expand from the Pacific to the Atlantic Ocean. The synthesis of the Louisiana Purchase and the later idea of Manifest Destiny helped spur many debates over newly gained territories through territorial expansion. These debates arose from issues on whether or not land from the Louisiana…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Manifest Destiny Benefits

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are different interpretation about manifest destiny today, many people define Manifest Destiny was a 19th century doctrine that the united states had the right and duty to expand through out the North American Territory. John O'sullivan defined manifest destiny as the divine and God given right of the American people to expand through the lands. I'll be defining Manifest destiny differently, Manifest destiny to me was/is the greedy want for resources, economical wealth, and land which drove the American government into causing an historical aberration i.e the trail of tears and the Mexican war which will remain in history forever. Expansionists/Nationalists felt the republic needed to expand so as to keep growing economically, military might etc even though it resulted to the killings of native Americans and a civil war between America and Mexico. Many supported Manifest destiny for moral, political, parotitic reasons but the Southerners supported it because they thought it would help spread slavery in the states.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The people of the United States believed it was their god given right to expand from the Atlantic Ocean, east to the Pacific Ocean, North to Canadian border, and South to Mexico. This idea of Manifest Destiny fueled the expansion into the West. Big indicators of Manifest Destiny were the use of the Oregon Trail, and the Mexican – American War. Despite Manifest Destiny bringing about an increase in sectionalism and conflict, it also allowed for the expansion of territory and fueled movement into the west. With people moving west into the newly claimed territory, there was controversy whether the territories would become free or slave states.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The territory expansion during the Westward expansion made it possible for the U.S. to acquire more land and in fact, its territory expanded almost 60%. With the United States increasing in land, it open doors to new discoveries, while also giving the American people a chance to experience freedom. However, there wasn’t a lot of Americans thrilled about the idea of going into Native Americans and Mexican territory and taking over their land. It took people like John O’Sullivan in 1839 to speak on the topic so people can have faith about what can come. In 1839, John O’Sullivan became an advocate for the idea of Manifest Destiny, which simply mean that the expansions of the westward area of the country was both justified and predictable.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Natives already had claim over the land, they were there first rightfully it was their land. The people of the United States had for the most part immigrated to the country and had no actual right to those lands. They used the idea of Manifest Destiny to give themselves the right to take over land that already belonged to someone else, claiming it was their destiny to expand westward and spread republican democracy. The United States did not want other countries to take over the land west of them, viewing it as a danger to their way of living.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays