As Shaktivishistadvaita is also named as Veseshadvita,Visistadvita,Shivadvita,Dvitadviata,Bhedaabheda,Shivayogaand Shatstala. Parabrahma is referred as Shiva or Parashiva. Parashiva is nothing but supreme consciousness, sthala, linga.Sthala is Shiva tatva, according MaggeMayideva the principle of shiva which is the cause of creation, maintaining and destruction is called sthala. Sthala is further divided lingasthala and angasthala. Linga (some times it is also called lingasthala) is once again divided into ishatalinga, pranalinga and bhavalinga and agngasthala is again divided into thyaganga, bhoganga and yoganga.Each triplet of linga and angasthalasare split into two. Former …show more content…
The Agamic Bhakti concept is, “The Agamic wisdom is implicitly present in the Nigama ,but it is the Agama which spells it out and brings the Vedic wisdom to its culmination and perfection” and concluded that “In the Agamic Bhakti tradition , there is a very positive towards the world. The world is God's own creation and His own manifestation. The world is to be accepted with the attitudeof reverence, as it isLord’s own form. Maya is the creative power (Shakti) of the Lord, soMaya is not to be taken as something dangerous. The Agamic Bhakta, instead of taking Sanyasa(renuciation) from the world , embraces his Lord's creation and in all love and visualizes the Lord in every practice of the creation. Moreover , he moves in the world as an instrument of the Lord, partaking in the cosmic Play(Leela ) of the Lord and doing good to all. He himself becomes happy and makesothers happy also.He does this in a natural spontaneous way; even his mere presence becamesnaturally beneficial to others. In this way the Bhaktanaturally becomes instrumental in the formation of a healthy and happy society”(Kamalakar Mishra …show more content…
Education emphasizes aims, curriculum, methodology, teaching -learning materials, and evaluation which are practical aspects of human learning process. This process leads to development from animal to human being. This development should be guided by a sound philosophy. But the application of the theoretical aspects of general philosophy to educational theory is not done meaningfully these days (Sheshadri, 2008). Hence the relationship between general philosophy and philosophy of education needs a serious review in the present context.
There is a need to synthesize philosophy and education so that it guide and practice in the present context. Today, the child can’t neglect this world as illusion neither can he be slave of consumerist culture. In this context philosophers, educationist and common man are realizing need of a balance between internal and external world.
Today, there is a need for individual personality development which is in harmony with universe. The question before the world is how to develop the individual human being, his welfare, his social personality and harmony with the universe. This challenging task of education can be achieved by accommodating individual differences of the child in this diversified world. The same can be better achieved by Eastern philosophy especially in Indian