Warnings/Promises

The case study I choose to work with was United States v. Juvenile Male. According to the study the juvenile male, R.P. identified himself as an adult the at the point of arrest. However, that was determined to be incorrect by the dispatcher when the Federal Border Patrol ran his information. R.P.’s date of birth was 1/1/1989. Around 1700 on the November 19, 2006 R.P. was detained for what at that time was believed to be smuggling of aliens into the US. At 0000 on November 20,2006 R.P. was read…

1. OPERATION OF THE VEHICLE: While traveling in the vicinity of Hurffville and Cooper Street, I was dispatched to a motor vehicle complaint. County Dispatch advised the vehicle was a sedan, marron in color. Dispatch also advised the caller was behind the vehicle at the Heritages and it was travelling towards the firehouse on Cooper St. I started my way towards the caller’s location, when I observed the vehicle passing Jones Ave, on the wrong side of the road. I activated my…

The Miranda warnings originated in the Court ruling of Miranda v. Arizona and became mandated to read to a suspect who is in custody and is going to be interrogated (Hall, 2015). In order for Miranda to apply, the court must determine several factors. The court must determine if the suspect was in custody, if an interrogation transpired, if the suspect’s statement was in direct response to an interrogation, if the government used the statement for prosecutorial reasons to prove guilt, and if…

Cooper in class final 1.What are the Miranda warnings and why are those provisions important? You have the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of law, you have the right to a lawyer, if you cannot afford a lawyer one will be given to you, do you understand the rights I have just read to you, with these rights in mind do you wish to speak to me. Those provisions are important because it protects a person's right not to self-accuse himself.…

committing specific offenses has during interrogations and must be told or informed of these rights prior to being questioned.When a police officer goes up to a person with the intent to question them then they do have to read the individual their Miranda Warnings. The reason being is that Miranda rights are only required when the police are questioning you in the context of a criminal investigation and hope to or desire to use your statements as evidence against you. Otherwise, Miranda doesn’t…

Some pros and cons of the Miranda Warning, I would say that some pros would be that the person simply knows what their rights are. They know that they have the right to an attorney, and to have them present during questioning. They know they can remain silent and don’t have to talk to the police. They know that if they do talk, the things they say can be used against them in court. These may all seem like simple things that anyone would understand or know, but they simply are not. These things…

some rights in modern law system. Some of them are most important and protected by contitutional law. Most important and first one is right to learn their rights. This article appeared with Miranda Decision by The Supreme Court in 1966. The Miranda warning is intended to protect the suspect’s Fifth Amendment right to refuse to answer self-incriminating questions (http://www.mirandarights.org/) so with this right the people who are under arrest must know their rights while questioning. It is…

in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?” History of Miranda Warning In June of 1963 Ernesto Arturo Miranda, a young man of 23 years of Mexican origin, was on trial for the kidnapping and rape of Jane Doe, a girl of 18, at the Superior Court of Maricopa County Arizona; not being able to allow his own law…

Prevention programs are some of the most prominent in a long list of initiatives the Army created to take care of its Soldiers. Each of these programs relies on Army Leaders to maintain personnel accountability and take initiative when a soldier exudes “warning signs” as described in each of the programs’ mandatory training…

ledge into the water. He became a quadriplegic almost immediately as his head struck a fully submerged rock. As a consequence, he brought this action for damages for the injuries he suffered, he further claimed that the Board failed to give any warning , adequate or otherwise, that it was unsafe to dive from the ledge when the Board must knew or ought to have known that the ledge formed a natural platform which could be assumed or is assumed to be safe for diving by the members of the…