Verdict

juror’s opinions and thoughts. It is extremely interesting to watch how most of the jurors had their minds made up about the case even before deliberation; however, as the film progresses the jurors stop labeling the defendant and instead make their verdict decision based on facts. The audience can see from this film that labeling an individual in the 1950’s might have been common, and unfortunately I believe that it still exists in today’s…

angry men” takes place in a courthouse in New York City. There is a trial going on involving a boy that is being charged for murdering his father. His sentence if guilty is the electric chair. The only thing that is deciding his fate, is the jury 's verdict. Guilty or non-guilty? These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the…

That been said, twelve men, member of the jury, truly got angry while they were trying to stand together to deliberate a verdict after an murder trial. This happened in the movies “12 Angry men” published in 1957 in New York City. The eight years old went to a trial for stabling his father to death. So after the trial, The 12 juror to the delegation room to decide on the verdict. If was to be one of the jury I should be the jury number 8 Henry Fonda, He had gotten some doubt about the case at…

The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This…

film, Twelve Angry Men, to critique the jury system by pointing out the flaws present. Racism, personal biases, unwillingness to cooperate and accusing someone incorrectly were all obstacles that each of the jurors had to face to reach the final verdict. It is with these factors that one can critique the jury system and judge whether or not the system is really doing us…

“We constantly modify our behavior, beliefs, and attitudes according to what we perceive about the people around us.” The latter concept of psychology coined by psychologist Marc Breedlove can be largely attributed to all people in their daily lives. The depiction of this is seen in a variety of different manners, one of these being in film. One such of these is the critically acclaimed film, 12 Angry Men, directed by Sidney Lumet based on the screenplay of the same title by Reginald Rose. Just…

The jurors had several conflicts when disagreeing, power and intimidation along with tense exchange of words and having over usage of tones over one another. Mainly, transference of anger ethical of virtue to occurring when the “12 Angry Men’ misunderstood one another. Although the film has a blatant simplicity the 12 men debate the fate of a young defendant charged with murdering his father. Since majority of the jurors held an alliance by voting guilty through persuasion to hurry the case move…

The consequences for committing sex crimes are very serious and knows no boundaries for the offenders who commit the act. In Father Flynn’s case there was no such consequence, in fact more like a commencement for him to start a new path elsewhere, leaving Father Flynn with as little to no suffrage to repent upon his actions. Even if his reason for committing the act was to provide comfort or security to Donald Muller, Father Flynn is guilty for molesting a child under the age of 18 years and…

decisions with regards to their clients and the specific cases that follow. Lawyers usually distance themselves from emotional morals due to the nature and requirements of their job. If a client wishes to be proven as not guilty, then that is the verdict that the lawyer must achieve using any lawful and truthful resource at his disposal, regardless of his beliefs towards the client’s guilt or innocence. The lawyer has many factors to consider when taking on a case which include: his moral…

crime. Most cases only take up to two or three days. Jurors have conversations discussing whether or not they should accuse the person guilty or non-guilty. Based on what the jurors come to as a whole of twelve, the decision could be proposed as an verdict. A jury is never impartial because there are twelve people and they are bound to have a preconceived idea. The people within a jury have their own opinions, and share them with the rest of the jury. Most of them are very opinionated when it…