United States Court of Claims

Microsoft v. United states December 2013, the agents of the federal law enforcement told the United States District Court that the warrant requiring Microsoft to disclose all e-mails and other information associated with the account of one of its customers. The people that need them because they had received reports and beliefs that the account was being used for drug trafficking and that they need the emails for proof. Magistrate Judge then issued the requested warrant. The United states in the…

a larger number of wrongful convictions in the supreme court justice. Inadequate defense lead to wrongful convictions which must be addressed by improving our court system laws and proper investigation. Inadequate defense is a major issue in the United States, which is caused by assuming that the victims are right about their attackers. The lawyers are not doing enough investigation, which is a major cause of the inadequate defenses. Courts arrest people due to past convictions (Kennedy). This…

put themselves down, leading to lack of self confidence and self worth. The court also said that the black schools and the white schools were equal in almost every way, and there was no reason to fix it. One of the claims a parents attempted to make was that the schools were not equal and that the Black schools were clearly underfunded, But the court investigated, and found that statement to be false in their area. The court made the comment that the white schools didn’t get free transportation…

in extensive government regulation for a quite a long period of time as compared to the United States. France is one of the Western Europe states whose law is based entirely on written civil law (Terrill, 2015). This is in contrast to England and the U.S. whose laws are mainly derived from the common law. Civil law can be defined as “the set of legal rules regulating the organization and functioning of courts of law competent disputes affecting private citizens” (Cadiet & Amrani-Mekki, 2008, p.…

Medellin v. Texas was a local court case that took place in 2007, and accomplished the Supreme Court ruling that non-local treaties, such as the Vienna Convention of the Laws treaty, were not self-executing, and therefore, were not binding upon state courts; in other words that if state courts decide not to honor such treaties, they were not forced to. Jose Ernesto Medellin was a Mexican citizen who was born in Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas, Mexico in March 4, 1975. Although he was born on the other…

Supreme Court clarified the ambiguity in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, where the Court interpreted the exemption for “contracts of employment” exceptionally narrowly. The Court held that the statute applied to all contracts of employment except those involving workers who, like seamen and railroad workers, were engaged in transportation that crossed state lines. . Therefore, it is now clear that the FAA allows enforcement of agreements mandating arbitration of employment…

The Plaintiffs claim that Grant caused problems with negotiations with Sony Pictures and the USA Network. Plaintiff further claims that Grant sent a letter calling Osuna book a fake and made other defamatory articulations about the Plaintiffs on his website. Issues: 1. Does the court have jurisdiction over the Defendant? 2. Should Grant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) be granted? 3. Does the Plaintiff state a claim…

case study is a survey period of cases that were not handed down by the United States Supreme Court, rather than the cases that were decided. My article was written by Peter Reed Corbin and John E. Duvall. Both attorney and partners of the FordHarrison LLP, Jacksonville , Florida. This article cover significant cases in the area of employment discrimination law decided by the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit during 2014. The cases cover…

The timespan between 1960’s and the 70’s was a period in the United States when immorality and relativism poisoned American culture on a large scale and allowed the attitude towards sexuality to be corrupted. The authority of the Catholic Church had been neglected as ideas of radical liberalism spread throughout the western world. This led to many practices, at one time recognized as atrocities, becoming commonplace and accepted in society; the most notable of which was abortion. Jane Roe was…

was O’Bannon v. NCAA. Even though this case started in 2013 it is still in courts to this date with appeals. Plaintiff: Edward C. O’Bannon, Jr Defendant Appellee, National Collegiate Athletic Association, AKA the NCAA Defendants: Electronic Arts, Inc.; Collegiate Licensing Company AKA CLA, Presiding Judge: Claudia Wilken, Senior District Judge Court: Northern District of California Appeals Court: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Appeals Date: September 2016 A little history of the…