Tsar

under the Soviet Union. The first revolution that took place in Russia was the Russian Revolution. It all started on February 23rd, 1917, when people started protesting on the streets in demand of more food after hearing rumors of hoard bread. Tsar Nicholas who in general didn't have any political knowledge, demanded for troops…

old regime collapsed was the personality and weak leadership of the Tsar.” To what extent is this statement accurate? The sovereignty of Nicholas II led to the ultimate collapse and diminishment of autocratic rule in Russia. The statement, “The fundamental reason why the old regime collapsed was the personality and weak leadership of the Tsar,” is significantly accurate as demonstrated through the decisions and responses of the Tsar during and post many events including: bloody Sunday in 1905,…

1. The movie depicts the change of identity in Russia and for the Russian people by showing the downfall of the Romanov dynasty. It starts with the beloved Tsar and Tsaritsa ruling over imperial Russia and progresses forward with them becoming less and less popular. This downward shift in popularity is partly because of the close friendship of the Tsaritsa with the drunkard Siberian priest Rasputin. Despite his stated noble intentions to help and serve his Matushka and Batushka his mere presence…

tsarist state of Russia fell is complex and has been interpreted in a variety of ways by historians. The fall began with the 1905 Revolution, on January 9th, or “Bloody Sunday” when a group of demonstrating workers with grievances for the Tsar were fired on by troops. Tsar Nicholas II agreed to concessions including the establishment of a State Duma. Despite these concessions, conflict and pressure continued leading to the final collapse of the tsarist system with the Revolution of 1917.…

The cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty has been said to have many different causes by different people like Rasputin, Tsar Nicholas II and even fate has been blamed. The aim of this investigation is to find out to what extent Tsarina Alexandra can be held responsible for the fall of the Romanov dynasty. By doing this we need to dive into her life and find out the way she acted, lived and what she did and the reasons she did them. This investigation is not to say that the fall of the…

200,000 men) causing the Tsarist government to lose the support of the military. Tsar Nicholas had difficulty responding to any criticism or creating social reforms because the aristocracy and military elites backing him were against any political or social change. Most importantly, the Duma abandoned the Tsar. All these events culminated in the fall of the Tsar and the formation of a Bolshevik government…

grievances for the Tsar were fired on by troops For Fitzpatrick, the causes of the fall of tsarism were both social and economic. In her understanding the fall of Tsarism was essentially inevitable. She writes, “The regime was so vulnerable to any kind of jolt or setback that it is hard to imagine that it could have survived long, even without the [First World] War.” The faults of the system, in her interpretation, were built into society. Fitzpatrick argues that even the Tsar saw the changes…

because it eventually led to the end of the tsar, but it was a wise move for Russia. Alexander II, the Russian Tsar from 1855 to 1881, introduced the beginnings of industrialization into Russia. Although the reforms that Alexander made were small, they will spark the rise of the third greatest industrial power in the World. This was a great move for bettering Russia, but will lead to the downfall of the tsar because of the inevitable opposition towards future tsars. Opposition was created…

factors, such as the Bloody Sunday Massacre. Conditional factors, such as the dictatorship and the Russo-Japanese war. And Contingent factors, which include the beliefs and attitudes of the Tsar and the declining standards of living of the peasant population. The beliefs, attitudes and personality of the Tsar himself was a major factor contributing to his unpopularity. He had a limited understanding of the poverty within Russia which meant that he didn’t make the reforms needed and decreased…

century; it cannot be doubted that it had a massive influence on social ideologies and world history. The Russian Revolution, known today as a bloody and chaotic revolution, was characterized by the friction that existed between the citizens of Russia and Tsar Nicholas II. In 1917, two revolutions swept through the country, ending the imperial rule that existed. In March, the February Revolution erupted and forced Nicholas II to abdicate. The Provisional Government was created and established,…