The Assassination of JFK was hugely significant to New Zealand as where the events that followed it. The significance of the event can simply be determined by the importance of the event. And how people perceived the event. Internationally, New Zealand’s people saw that the assassination of JFK as huge event that deeply affected people at the time. Some accounts, record information such as “the importance she felt… that she was able to follow an world event for the first time”. This account alone single-handedly shows how the people of New Zealand were connected with the outside world. ‘For the first time’. Thus, indicating that the JFK event was ‘the most life changing’ events in one’s life at the time, maybe even one’s life. This is a feeling that would run deep within a person, for an extended amount of time. The extent of the event inflicted everyone’s life stories as people could recall where they were at the exactly when they heard the news. Big events such as Diana’s death and 9/11 are same in the certain respect that it changed history forever. It changed history forever, it was significant to people’s memories forever. What also changed history forever was the potential repercussions of the assassination. Some accounts recorded from New Zealanders contained such information as “was about to change the world”. This quote is very significant as the events that followed the assassination affected New Zealanders. These events were related to such comments. Such…
Kennedy’s death arose from Europe. As the idea of there having been a conspiracy to kill the president rapidly spread through Europe, it in time made it’s way onto America’s shores. According to statistics gathered from the American public, seventy-percent of the American population suspects that there was a conspiracy to kill President Kennedy ("Conspiracy Theories"). Jim Garrison, a New Orleans native, was the lead Prosecutor of Clay Shaw, also known as the second man to be tried for…
includes $20 million of indirect manufacturing costs that are fixed irrespective of changes in the volume of output per month, while the remaining variable indirect manufacturing costs change with the production volume. Given the unit volume changes for August 2008, the use of total manufacturing cost per unit from the past month at a different unit volume level (both in aggregate and at the individual product level) will yield incorrect estimates of total costs of $600.53 million in August 2008…