Transactional leadership

Inspiring the individual people in groups to become unified is considered transformational leadership (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). Conversely, transactional leadership relies solely on the assignment at hand. Motivating others creates an environment that enables the group to achieve great results, whereas the task-focused groups are not always successful. Although each type of leader uses influence strategies, the strategies utilized by the transactional leader are far different than the ones chosen by a transformational leader (Griffith & Dunham, 2015). It is more likely that a leader who stimulates a group will reply on inspirational and personal appeal, as well as mentorship. Conversely, a leader that is transactional relies on the managing…

Part C Transactional leadership According to Burns (2003), transactional and transformational leadership are not mutually exclusive, he considers transactional leadership to be moral. Transactional leadership revisits the leadership exchange theories where a specific legislation favored by the leader constituency will be pushed by him or her in exchange for the votes from constituents. The morality related to transactional behavior is highly effective, usually serves the greater good and is…

According to Burns (1978), a transactional style was often defined as autocratic leadership or ‘top down’. ‘Transactional’ leadership is passive and focuses around exchanges or rewards for compliance with leader’s requests. It often appeals to the follower’s self-interests to motivate their performance. Burns also advocated that ‘transformational’ leadership is characterized by vision, influence, personal relationships and creativity. It would appear that Carmichael et al., (2011) believe that…

Transformational leaders help their subordinates in satisfying their potential abilities and expanding their obligations towards their job. Therefore, leaders who are transformational differs from transactional leaders in diagnosing the needs on the ground that transactional leader tries to address lower issues than higher needs, for example, on the issue of improvement and development. Transformational leader must separately recognize what spurs any of his followers. It is a known fact that…

consistently evolving, so is leadership theory and concepts. Transformational and transactional leadership theories have evolved over the decades to include the studies of James Burns in 1978 and a more modernized theory conceptualized by Bernard Bass in 1985. Traditional leadership theories are relevant and still appear in modern theories in the form of transactional aspects. Studying transformational leadership and its evolution demonstrates the importance and relevance of the theory and…

Unlike transactional leadership, transformational leadership are suggested by Bass et al. (2003) to be adaptive and will work effectively in the changing environment (as cited in Kriger and Zhovtobryukh, 2016, p.89). The concept of transformational and transactional leadership was first introduced by Burns on 1978 regarding to political leadership, and was being developed and elaborated by Bass on 1985. According to Burns (1978), Universitas Kristen Petra transactional leadership will focus on…

Leadership is the ability to lead the individuals of an organization to achieve their potential as individuals and as a group. Each person is interconnected to the other individuals within the organization, with all parties being considered an essential element to the function of the organization. However, an organization with poor leadership will stumble and fall more than an organization with great leadership. Leaders do not need to be the head of an organization, but can exist…

Introduction The aim of this essay is to discuss whether leadership makes a difference to organizational performance. For the past few decades, the research of leadership is seen as highly relevant and important area (Bryman, 2011). There has been a big requirement of leadership qualities and methods to help improve or generate the efficiency in organizations’ structures. Companies have been looking for great leaders to enhance competitive advantage. However, this has been questioned by many…

Transactional leadership is a style that lays out clear goals and objectives. To encourage staff members to act in accordance with these goals, punishments and rewards are utilised (Business Dictionary, n.d.). Three disadvantages of using a transactional leadership style: Motivation. There is only a general view of motivation present, this means that there is no consideration of individual variances. The reward/punishment strategy doesn’t tend to motivate beyond the base level of a person’s…

According to Odumeru (2013), transactional leadership, known as managerial leadership, focuses on the role of supervision, organisation, and group performance; transactional leadership is a style of leadership in which the leader promotes compliance of his followers through both rewards and punishments. Within the context of Maslow 's hierarchy of needs, transactional leadership works at the basic levels of need satisfaction, with rewards being given for good work or positive outcomes. These…