Tennis court

This case arises out of damages sustained to a 397-unit apartment complex in Camp Springs, Maryland. The Owner, Metropolitan Apartments at Camp Springs, LLC (“Metropolitan”), incurred significant property damage following a magnitude 5.8 earthquake that occurred on August 23, 2011. (E. 1013). Appellee is WCS Construction, LLC (“WCS”), which served as the general contractor and construction manager of the project called “Town Center at Camp Springs Apartments.” (E. 947) Appellant is the…

that Mr. Latimer’s Charter rights had not been violated (Supreme Court Judgments, 2016). This is significant because it was Latimer who violated Tracy’s Charter rights and he was receiving the appropriate consequences for his intentional actions. Moreover, I feel this way because Constable Lyons stated, “Certainly the grounds to arrest were present, certainly there were reasonable and probable grounds to arrest him”(Supreme Court Judgments, 2016). This proves that the Supreme Court’s decision…

The Supreme Court Justice is a federal Court which is the highest body in the judicial branch. The Supreme Court is made up of a chief justice and eight associate justices, every one of whom are delegated by the president and affirmed by the Senate. Giving the unforeseen circumstances, our current Justice Scalia has unfortunately passed away during 2016 creating the current vacancy. Now we are in a bit of a pickle because the Court is currently split 4 to 4 between conservatives and liberals.…

mock trial involved two opposing teams displaying evidence that is included in the information given, eg. police report, police interview and witness recounts. The verdict was decided by a jury and an impartial judge was used to keep order in the court. With this information the members of the two teams allocated certain roles to members of the group. These roles included barristers and witnesses. In the mock trial that I was involved in the role allocated to me was the witness name Joel Smith…

terms of said agreement can be drawn up through various methods of informal negotiations outside of the courtroom. A fair agreement, one that also tackles the issue of a custodial parent moving out of state, is likely to be deemed as acceptable to the court. If a cordial relationship is maintained between the parents, the best method of arriving at an agreement is to draft one together. For instance, perhaps one parent is given physical custody, while the other is given partial custody and…

Sarah Johnson, at the Allegany County Circuit Court at the address of 30 Washington Street, Cumberland MD, 21502. The judge for that morning was W. Timothy Finan. Upon entering the front door, you had to put all of your stuff in tubs that they ran through the security scanner; while they were doing that, you walked through a scanner as well. On the other side you reclaimed your items. The security officer then directed us upstairs to the second court room. Upstairs we met the bailiff who…

to be made a quick and I having tried of a lot cases I’m familiar with how cases should be ruled.” With those experience in mind Theall suggested a change in requirement to the 10 years of practicing law that is required to run for the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeal. “There is a minimum of 10 years to run for this positions,” she said. “You do not know you are as a lawyer in 10 years and I think 15-20 years should be required to run for this position.” Theall believes her experience as a judge…

When a defendant released on cash bail fails to appear in court, or otherwise violates a condition of their bail, the court can declare the bail bond forfeited. State laws often require that notice of the forfeiture be sent to the defendant and to their surety. Once the surety is notified, they can produce the defendant, provide the court with an excuse deemed acceptable for the defendant’s non-appearance, pay the forfeited bond, or face the consequences of not paying it In some countries, a…

Jurors watch a trial, and focus on which side is more truthful, to determine whether they should vote for a verdict. Jurors believe witness testimony is important. Therefore, witnesses could cause you to win or lose a case, because jurors evaluate witness testimony and whether the witness is honest. When jurors trust an expert witness or an eye witness, his side is likely to win the case. Cross-examining an expert witness or an eye witness who has proved himself honest is a risky endeavor,…

trial documents are by far the most interesting primary source. They are broken down into five subgroups of their own: Outline of Proceedings, Examination of Jurors – Selection, Witness Testimony, Exhibits and Proceedings at the Illinois Supreme Court. An interesting document in the first subgroup is the Petition for Change of Venue. It stresses that the defendants…