Snell's law

Nowadays, public shaming is as common as self-righteous boycotts, Twitter hashtag social movement, and counterproductive protests. So common, in fact, that it is not unheard of for the supposed guilty party, to be entirely innocent. This is one of the reasons I cannot, in good conscience, advocate for the implementation of it as a form of punishment. Furthermore, public shaming is an unfair penalty and should not become an official penalty because it can easily become excessive, is irreversible,…

As human beings, it is in our nature to want to advance as a species and to make leaps and bounds in science and technology. We simply want to be the best of the best. We strive for perfection and consistently fall short. So the question is, is it possible for a utopian society to exist? For a utopian society to exist, it must possess perfect qualities; or in other words, be the ideal society in which to live. In the world today, we struggle with disease, violence, and other evils that prevent…

technical assistance aimed at empowering the Centre to carry out specialized training for law enforcement officers and judiciary personnel on the nature of drug dependence as a preventable, treatable disease, and methods of early intervention. Following the training-of-trainer cascade model, and working alongside UNO DC experts, specialist team from NAU FAR will be empowered to be a training and reference resource for law enforcement officers and the judiciary. ( great) Family skills training…

very large number of cases. Judicial independence is the keystone of Canadian judiciary. That is the reason, the judiciary is an independent from other branches of government, the executive and legislative. The main role of a judge is to interpret laws. Judicial independence means that, the other organs of the government must not restrain the functioning and should not interfere with its decision of the judiciary in such a way that is unable to do justice. Judges must be able to perform their…

the definitions of morality, ethics, values and virtues are made by men and not by ‘gods’? These are created in order to put a barrier from conflicting interests. That is why, according to Hegel, rules and laws are considered to be a compromise among the differences of men. Although, how can laws of men be seen as “good” when past (some at present) practices of the primitive societies, do not seem ethical right in the twenty-first century. Roman nobility treated slaves as inhuman and it was…

Respect for Others or Harassment, Bullying And Victimisation Policy ` Juatco Law Offices strictly does not tolerate any form of harassment, bullying and/or victimisation. An employee who has committed any of the following acts shall be terminated. Harassment Sexual Harassment can be physical conduct ranging from the invasion of personal space and/or inappropriate touching to serious assault. It can include questions or remarks about a person’s sex life, comments or ridicule about appearance or…

McWhorter The Framers of the Constitution created a system of government with three distinct and independent branches - the leglislative (Congress), the executive (the President and all of his cabinents and departments), and the judicial the courts). These three branches share power and each power serves as check on the others. Why was this system important to the framers . Do you think this is still an effective system of government? Seperation of powers is an effective system of government.…

Business Pest Control One of the best advantages for any fruitful organization is their capacity to give a sheltered and sound environment for its workers, and considerably all the more critically, its clients. Business bother control guarantees this level of solace in security and wellbeing through administrations rendered so as to dispense with and keep the vicinity of nuisances, for example, rodents, arachnids, bugs, termites, winged creatures and some other undesirable visitor occupying…

lawyers from it’s induction in law, accellerating intense legal debate for the justification for this "strange and wonderful" doctrine per Holmes. From it’s appearance in the Code of Hammurabi to it’s presence with English lawyers in decisions ranging from the Statute of Wills in 1540, the Statute of Tenures in 1660 and even in current pending cases, this doctrine has been controversial in every respect ranging from public policy considerations to human rights law. Professor Wade described it…

We could divert our energies to the think about the relationship between citizens and constitutions, to the means of realizing democracy at the level of the fundamental laws, instead of focusing our attention on who should have the final word about the meaning of a constitutional provision. This, of course, does raise the stakes, constitutional theorists are no longer supposed to decide which of two more or less predictive…