Search and rescue

room, and bubble bath. By stealing her own necklace, she could easily collect insurance money and pay for the expensive goodies she bought, but still keep her necklace. Even though all of the suspects were searched for the necklace, they did not search Mrs. Van Bliven’s suitcase, and it is highly likely that her necklace is hidden inside of it. In conclusion, it is clear that Mrs. Van Bliven stole her own necklace because the crime scene is not legitimate and because she would have needed to…

by officers acting in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate but ultimately found to be invalid. Pp. 905-925. (United States v. Leon, (1984) No. 82- 1771.) In view of the modification of the exclusionary rule, the Court of Appeals' judgment cannot stand in this case. Only respondent Leon contended that no reasonably well trained police officer could have believed that there existed probable cause to search his house. However, the record establishes…

considered the search a violation of the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. Chief Justice Warren and Justices Clark, Black, Douglas, Brennan and Stewart agreed the police abused their power against Mapp’s will. Moreover, the Supreme Court applied the exclusionary rule to the case, which means evidence obtained illegally can’t be used in court. The Constitution stated the police need a warrant in order to search a person’s house. Therefore, any evidence obtained without a search warrant…

On 09/07/2006 at 1011 hours, I was patrolling eastbound on Highway 10 at Ives Road. I observed a vehicle matching the description of one I know to be occupied by a wanted person and possibly involved in several thefts in the area. I observed the vehicle was parked on the side of the northbound lane, facing south. I then observed a white female I know to be suspect, Patti Jo Denoon, exit the passenger side of the vehicle and sit on a brick, speaking to several other persons. I knew P. Denoon to…

Since the search was done from outside of the home, it did not reveal any of the activities inside of this house. (Doc. C) According to Justice John Paul Stevens, “The officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly reasonable…”. The imager did not go through the walls of the home, therefore it was not a search and did not require a warrant. (Doc. F) The fourth amendment protects against unwarranted searches…

sixth, and eight amendments. These rights mentioned have evolved because of other cases that have affected the criminal justice system. The freedom from unreasonable search and seizures is protected by The Fourth Amendment. The people are protected, and secure in their persons, homes, papers, and effects against unreasonable search and seizures are not to be violated. Unless there is probable cause, no warrants shall be issued,…

The court concluded that a warrantless search is only pardoned when there are purposes of protecting the arresting officer or to preserve any essential evidence. None of these two exceptions were present during the arrest and seizure of the cell phone. Police officers have the capability to protect…

Alba Zhingri Terry vs. Ohio This case was decided on June 10, 1968. Detective Martin McFadden was known on the Cleveland police force for his skill in apprehending pickpockets. He was patrolling for many years. On October 31, 1963 he saw two men, John W. Terry and Richard Chilton, standing on a street corner and acting in a suspicious way. Both men were repeatedly going back and forth along an identical route, pausing to stare in the same store window. They were joined by a third man Carl Katz…

Capt Barcelo, On 07/08/2017 at approximately 17:50 hrs we received a call from city resident, Kurt Salzillo, in reference to a shoplifter at Walmart. Salzillo observed the suspect who committed the theft and he followed the suspect while landline with 911. Although advised not to follow the suspect, Salzillo continued to while reporting his current location. His final location was reported at Bay Boulevard and Wilkins St. The suspect was described as a White male wearing a dark tee-shirt and…

(D) Even if this Court finds that the initial search and seizure is illegal under the Fourth Amendment, Evidence of the Suicide Note is still Admissible through the Attenuation Doctrine, as an Exception to the Exclusionary Rule The “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” is an exclusionary rule designed to deter police misconduct that prohibits the introduction of evidence that is causally connected to an unlawful search. (People v. Navarro (App. 2 Dist. 2006) 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 164.) The defendant…