Reasonable suspicion

    Page 3 of 42 - About 417 Essays
  • Blizzard Resort Case Study

    the race. Mitchie may argue that Blizzard didn’t stop the next group of racers coming down the hill, but perhaps because they did not know Mitchie was injured on the hill. Blizzard Resorts Inc. did not fall below the standard of care as they took reasonable precaution at the top of the hill to prevent people who deem not capable to participate. As the result of the collision, Mitchie sustained a broken nose, lacerations to his face and also a broken leg after hit by the next group of racers…

    Words: 1306 - Pages: 5
  • 5 Elements Of Negligence Tort

    Negligence tort occurs when one fails to demonstrate the kind of care a prudent and reasonable person would take under the identical circumstances and injury was birthed from the act or the absence of it. In order to justify that the defendant was negligent and therefore liable for one’s injuries, all 5 elements of tort ought to be satisfied. The 5 elements are: Duty, Breach of Duty, Cause in Fact, Proximate Cause and damages Jane v Luke Since Jane has suffered injuries, she in immediately…

    Words: 1959 - Pages: 8
  • Negligent Tort Case Study

    The Case of Negligent Tort On April 23, 2015, the Consumer Product Safety Commission announced the recall on Roberta Roller Rabbit Children’s Pajama Sets due to a violation associated with the required Federal Flammability Standards. The Recall number is 15-122, according to the Consumer Product Safety Division the product does not meet the Flammable Fabrics Act, “The children’s pajama sets fail to meet federal flammability standards for children’s sleepwear.”(www.cpsc.gov 2015). The Consumer…

    Words: 1339 - Pages: 6
  • Rockhead's Gym Case Study

    seems to be very reasonable. For the unconscious of plaintiff, it largely because of Jim was hitting the ground with his upper part of body. The upper part of body is very weak and easy to get injured, especially the back. The probability is pretty high when a human’s upper back heavily crushed on the floor and ending up with an unconscious. In conclusion, the defendant needs to be punished financially, because defendant did cause the harm. The result of defendant’s action is reasonable and…

    Words: 795 - Pages: 4
  • Tort Law Essay

    refreshments was held no entitled to sue the owner of the public house. It would be otherwise if there was a bailment or entrustment, express or implied. ii. The duty of the occupier arises in respect of a danger which he knew or ought to have known by reasonable care. He is therefore bound to take care to ascertain existing dangers, and cannot plead ignorance. iii. The duty of the invitor is different in different cases. In some cases, it may be enough to give notice or warning of the…

    Words: 1932 - Pages: 8
  • Superposh Hotels Case Study

    pool. Then no duty of care is owed as the Hotel took reasonable steps to prevent Clive as a trespasser entering in the pool as in Donoghue v Folkestone Properties [2003] EWCA Civ 231The claimant was injured when he was trespassing on a slipway in a harbour and dived into the sea. The injury happened in the middle of winter and it was around midnight when the injury was caused. The court held that the occupier did not owe a duty of care. A reasonable occupier would not expect that a trespasser…

    Words: 2616 - Pages: 11
  • Case 5.2: Negligence

    Case 5.2: Negligence on page 101 Negligence is defined as “failure to exercise the care toward others which a reasonable or prudent person would do in the circumstances, or taking action which such a reasonable person would not.” (Law.com Legal Dictionary, 2017) “Under the doctrine of unintentional tort, commonly referred to as negligence, a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions.” (Cheeseman, 2013, pp.91) To be a successful case of negligence, it…

    Words: 998 - Pages: 4
  • The Doctrine Of Res Ipsa Loquitor

    of the inference to be drawn from the known facts. Everything depends upon the particular facts of each case. An inference of negligence might be so clear that no reasonable person could fail to accept it. If the defendant offers no explanation, the court can direct a verdict for the plaintiff if the inference is so strong that reasonable jurors could not reach any other conclusion. Where the jury considers the question of negligence, it can decide that the facts do not logically lead to an…

    Words: 1346 - Pages: 6
  • Patients Informed Consent

    Patients have the right to know everything about their medical conditions. While being aware of their situation they are able to approve or disagree medical treatments. Patients right also include their privacy which prohibit unauthorized personnel to access their record, or being present at the time of treatment. They are entitled to know what kind of risk they are about to go through with certain treatment or surgical procedure. In order for the physician start and process he/she needs to…

    Words: 997 - Pages: 4
  • Essay On Tort Law

    relationship, one party has a legal obligation to act in a certain manner toward the other. The second element is a breach of the duty of care. A person or entity (such as a business or government agency) breaches the duty of care by not exercising reasonable care in fulfilling the duty. The third element is causation. The breach of the duty of care must be the legal cause of the harms suffered by the injured person. There are two typed components of legal causation which are the actual cause…

    Words: 706 - Pages: 3
  • Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 42

Related Topics:

Popular Topics: