Rational basis review

Lamb, a book review from New York Times Database source, provides a lengthy detailed description, for a rather formal audience, with a useful recommendation. However, from the same book, She’s Come Undone, a Goodreads’s user from a Web source, provide a short summary, with no details or specific informational context, for a rather informal audience and also providing a useful recommendation. These two book’s reviews are destine to different audiences, Hilma Wotlizer’s New York Times review, is a…

Starting with the first day we moved into our dorm we are greeted by new faces and take part in activities that would reserve a permanent place in our memories. Students arrived at Michigan State from different cities, different states, and even different countries, and we were placed in dorm rooms and worked to find our way to class. These students have different backgrounds and goals, and each had an idea for a career, but we all share the need to be able to communicate at a college level and…

My experience with peer editing has overall been a positive experience for a couple reasons, the first being the ideas another person brings to your writing. My peers have always been supportive and helpful with my papers when it comes to my ideas not being totally organized. Getting another opinion has always been something that I have found helpful when I am writing, especially when my paper has not been completely finished. Although, when my paper is finished and I go through peer editing I…

paper in Fox’s class relies too heavily on this interaction between students, then the level of review and help each student receives will vary based on who they are paired with. For example, before turning in the final copy of a paper, Fox will have students review and critique each other’s papers. A student who needs help with their paper may be paired with someone who will not know how to properly review a paper. Thus the quality of help the student receives for their paper relies on how…

experts edit and review it prior to it being published. The review process is stringent and NEJM accepts only five percent of articles submitted for publication (NEJM, n.d.). The process of publication involves the collaboration of editors, statistical experts, illustrators, manuscript editors, proofreaders and production personnel (NEJM, n.d.). An example of an article which went through this process and was successfully…

As far as peer response is concerned, I have absolutely no experience having it done by anyone other than my wife. I have never read another person’s writing and given my critique or suggestions of how it should be written. As I watched A Peer Response Demonstration (2010) video, I found it very informative. I could see myself like the first person in the video. Like her, I wouldn’t want to be too critical because I would feel bad hurting someone’s feelings. I guess that is why I haven’t…

evaluate the strength of evidence for each article was the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence table obtained from the Center for Evidenced Based Medicine (2009). The search engines and databases searched in the literature review were chosen to optimize the literature search for high quality evidence. CINAHL (Current Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) is a bibliographic search database, which contains references to articles from over 2,900 journals as well as…

Journal Review Pick a peer-reviewed article (see course materials) from a journal within the radiology profession (ASRT Scanner, Radiologic Technology, SIIM, etc.). The article should discuss a relevant topic to this course or a trend within the radiology profession. Topics can include new legislation, technology, market trends, governance, economics, insurance, or human resources. Analyze the article as to: (A) quality of the written article in terms of your understanding of the content,…

Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, 19(3), 117-122. Xiong, X., Wang, P., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, S. (2015). The Effects of Red Yeast Rice Dietary Supplement on Blood Pressure, Lipid Profile and C-reactive Protein in Hypertension: A Systematic Review. critical reviews in food science and…

that I began incubating throughout the entire day. That night I had used my outline and made a really rough draft of my paper. The day of peer review I was prepared to have a lot of feedback about how I needed to use more supporting details and finish my paper because I only had one-third of my paper done. The feedback that I received from my peer review was somewhat helpful. This is because some of the feedback that I received was unhelpful feedback that I knew that I needed to complete such as…