Randomized controlled trial

Liz Canner is a filmmaker concerned with revealing the role of pharmaceutical companies in constructing a false disorder against which women can measure the status of their sexual lives. For nine years, Canner follows the company Vivas and their attempt to get a drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that combats the newly-labeled Female Sexual Dysfunction. She reveals pharmaceutical interests and the way they are intertwined in the public’s perception of healthy and “normal”.…

These trials were run to bring Nazi war criminals to justice. Twenty-one men sat on trial for their crimes, eighteen were found guilty, eleven were hanged, and the other seven served ten years to life for their crimes. The one man I am going to focus on is Lieutenant Colonel Adolf Eichmann. He was ruthless when describing his role in the killing of Jews in Europe. Hannah Arednt, who was a witness to the trial, described him as a “thoughtless, self-serving…

A placebo is a harmless pill, medicine, or procedure prescribed more for the psychological benefit to the patient than for any physiological effect. Researchers use placebos during studies to help them understand what effect a new drug or some other treatment might have on a particular condition. Researchers then compare the effects of the drug and the placebo on the people in the study. That way, they can determine the effectiveness of the new drug and check for side effects. The use of placebo…

He carries this out in the relatively simple fashion of a clock. Many members of the Jury simply wish to conclude the trial and be allowed to leave so the eighth Juror sets a time limit of seven o’clock ( p.55) and agrees to call a “hung Jury” if they cannot reach a decision. Like many other well-known plays when time is added to the equation the stakes are always raised…

Crito, a friend and follower of Socrates, arrives in his prison cell one day and tries to convince Socrates into escaping. Socrates counters Crito by giving a few arguments as to why he should not escape, yet his arguments could also be disputed in some ways which brings up the question of Socrates intents. For example, his first argument is that he should not escape as it would mean harming someone and you should never harm even if you are harmed first. This could be contradicted with an act of…

Organizational Assessment JFCS Jewish Family and Children’s Services (JFCS) is a non-profit, non-sectarian organization that offers behavioral health and social services to children, families, and adults. JFCS saw its inception in 1935 when a group of Jewish women in Phoenix ventured to create a social service agency to aid those in need. This group of women pledged to share what few they possessed to help others endure the great depression. Their mission changed the face of child welfare in…

In the show, “How I Met Your Mother” a group of five friends in their twenties share memories, experiences and jokes while each embarking upon their own unique journeys through early adulthood. In the ninth and final season of the show, the eighteenth episode revolves around the wedding day of two of the main characters. Barney Stinson and Robin Scherbatsky are getting married, but Barney, the opportunist, high energy groom is completely incapacitated from his previous night out. With wedding…

Clinical trials have been performed at many sites around the world for many years to obtain approvals in multiple countries. The harmonization of regulatory processes developed by the ICH, drug patent laws, and country specific regulations is very important steps towards the product development, such as drug discovery, early development and preclinical testing, clinical trials and marketing authorizations. Nearly every country agrees to accept…

This case regarding Hinton involves the sixth amendment, various examples of how one can file a motion to suppress a charge/extend the trial, and goes off of the same basis and similarity of “Strickland v Washington”. This Supreme Court case all began in 1985 when a serious of restaurant robberies turned deadly in relatively the same way. Authorities had no leads until one of the restaurant managers survived an attack and picked out Mr. Hinton from a group of pictures presented before him. The…

at the full statistics, the opinions are stacked 3-2 in favor of reversing the lower courts decisions in favor of Dr. Smith. Therefore, seeing as how Shelley had won the previous case, this would also overturn her victory and either call for a new trial or it would determine Dr. Smith as the victor. In short, this…