Public international law

Drones strikes don’t have any good outcomes on the war on terrorism all they do is cause problems. Drones are a violation certain laws like International Covenant on civil and Political Rights. There are no good outcomes from drone strikes the civilians are afraid of drones they are afraid of if the drone will kill them or not. When family is apart of collateral damage that's what causes people to be motivated to join the terrorist against the americans and their ideals. Drones strikes and…

terrorists. “Believed” is a strong word in this situation because according to the law, one is innocent until proven guilty—which drones do not bother practicing. UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial executions, Phillip Alston, took a stand against the CIA and their drone…

people from the terrorist so we must fight back.According to Jarret .T Crawford ,Shaun Wiley and Nina Ventresco in page 25 “Examining Americans Attitudes Towards Drone Strikes on Eve of the 2012 Presidential Election”. “Analysis of social Issues & Public policy 14.1(2014:46-60 Academic search Premier.Web 10 May 2016.The Central Intelligence Agency began targeting alleged members of al-Qaeda with remote control-operated drones.Also that what happened in Chicago represents growing lawlessness…

The proposition side’s first contention is that it provides research for militants and scientists. When countries are going to attack a area, they need to know what the area is like and that is what exactly one of the good uses a drone has without risking a life. According to the Brookings Institution, “all countries excluding third have 13% higher success right when studying the target zone in terms of killing the terrorists using drones.” When we success rate goes up then the terrorists will…

The Ethics of Drone Warfare The first recorded use of attack drones occurred on July 15, 1849. The setup for these drones was simple; a balloon attached to a basket would carry a bomb, the attackers would then calculate how much air the balloon needed to reach the desired destination. After that, these early UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) would be sent off to cause destruction. In my opinion, this method seems childish, but this elementary design has helped shape how war is carried out today.…

combat the terrorists without killing civilians. Moreover, this nation needs to use diplomacies and sanctions to the country that aids terrorists. Nevertheless, drones should not be used because drones kill innumerable innocent people, violate international laws, and the United State spends a lot of money in drones. Drones kill many innocent people when they go on a mission. Numerous missions from drones are to kill terrorists, yet civilians are killed from drones, too. For example, the…

Other perspectives, especially the political cases from the Middle Eastern nations, do not advocate for drones, as drone strikes may cause unintended collateral damage to this area of attack. For example, drones carry inherent political costs to nations, such as Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, and even Afghanistan. According to an article written by respected journalist Joshua Foust on the political consequences of drone strikes, domestic populations in the area of attack perceive drones as “almost…

right to self-defense and the right to equality in international law. In short, the "autonomous self-determination," the highest authority. The concept of sovereignty to enter the field of international law, is derived from Hugo Grotius which a book called< the Law of War and Peace>, he stands in a legal perspective elaborated and demonstrated the principle of sovereignty between countries.(Chun.S,2005,p.5) As the cornerstone of the international law, the principle of state sovereignty…

throughout history. Since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648, the tension between state sovereignty and international intervention in pursuit of human rights protection has been contested. Over three centuries later, and the United Nations Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine has codified human rights protection in a global political commitment of the highest order. Following the international acceptance of the R2P, many who support state protection contest the legitimacy of the doctrine, and…

I. INTRODUCTION The international community appears to believe that there is a direct correlation between military intervention and cessation of gross violations of human rights that are being committed by the government of a state, supposing that there will be an improvement in the conditions for those against whom these violations are being committed if there is a legal humanitarian intervention. This assumption is largely based on the concept that if an intervention is legal, it will be…