Procedure codes

PARTIES: P = Ensign and others D = Walls PRIOR HISTORY: Plaintiffs claimed that Defendant’s business constitutes a nuisance. Trial court enjoined defendant from continuing her business after 90 days. Defendant appealed. FACTS: For some years, at 13949 Dacosta street, in the city of Detroit, the Defendant had a business of raising, breeding and boarding St. Bernard dogs. Her business is adjacent to the Plaintiff's neighbor, Defendant's business would give off obnoxious odors and…

her employment contract. This agreement stated that any conflict that arose between her and the employer would be handled through an arbitration process. Inside this agreement Hooters had listed their arbitration procedures. Along with this, Hooters had the ability to change these procedures if/when they felt it was necessary based on the conflict, etc. Annette was unaware of these circumstances because she had not been shown all of this information until after the contract had been signed.…

This is an appeal by the Petitioner, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, from a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the federal circuit (Moore, J.,) dated December 22, 2015 vacating and remanding the decision of the United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, In re Tam, 108 U.S.P.W.2d 1305, No. 85472044, 2013 WL 5498164 (T.T.A.B. 2013). Respondent is a member of the rock band “The Slants.” He sought to federally register the mark THE SLANTS in connection with live…

Plaintiff’s closing will be presented through a summary of each of the witnesses, in the order of testimony. In addition, Plaintiff Gendron will point to the various portions of the exhibit list. Roxann Gendron is the executor of the Marion Hinkmeyer Estate. Ms. Gendron testified that she was planning on moving into the property following her mother’s death and made preparations to do the same. She testified that by moving that she would have saved a mortgage payment of $1,251. Given the poor…

The film A Civil Action is about the court case of multiple families that have lost their children to leukemia. These families believed that the city’s tap water was contaminated with trichloroethylene which ultimately lead to these children’s untimely death. The main family that brought this concern into light was Anne Anderson, when her toddler died of leukemia. The lawsuit, which was made by the plaintiff’s law Jan Schlichtmann, was against industrial operations. Even though only one out of…

41/12 The first report stated the future care cost to be $582,128.81. The supplemental report cost is $612,542.86. His opinions are the same in both reports. 43/23 The Plaintiff was accompanied by her husband during Dr. Gonzales’ examination of her. 44/15 He did not interview the Plaintiffs’ children. 44/23 He guesses the Plaintiff’s examination lasted between one and one and a half hours. 45/2 Most of the examination consists of discussing the Plaintiff’s medical history. 15 minutes is devoted…

At this stage in the proceedings all factors weigh against plaintiff. Regarding the first factor, Plaintiff states that he lives and resides in Childress, Texas; which is over 500 miles from Defendants’ premises. It can be determined that Plaintiff does not reside near Defendants’ premises. Moving to the second factor – Plaintiff’s past patronage – Plaintiff admits that he has no history of visiting Red Rocks, other than the concert which lead to this instant action. Regarding the third…

DEMAND FOR A VERIFIED BILL OF PARTICULARS PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the undersigned demands that the answering defendant serves upon plaintiff within thirty (30) days, a verified Bill of Particulars of the claims alleged in said defendant’s Answer, setting forth specifically and in detail the answers to the following inquiries: 1. As to the First Defense, particularize and identify the collateral sources rendered and the amount of collateral offset that is claimed. 2. As to the…

On October 11, 2017, a Complaint for Damages and Intentional Breach of Assigned Duties Against Power of Attorney for SELF-DEALING, MISAPPROPRIATION of FUNDS and/ or UNJUST ENRICHMENT of Assets or Property was filed in this Honorable Court by Plaintiff against Defendant, DEON B. CARTER (hereinafter “Defendant). Defendant was appointed Power of Attorney for the Plaintiff if incompetence emerges. A copy of Power of Attorney agreement created on November 29, 2016 which appoints Defendant is attached…

Argument for Tangible Detriment: The District court improperly granted summary judgment as a reasonable jury could find that Prufrock suffered a tangible detriment when he was denied tutoring and received the worst English grade of his college career after he rejected Crewel 's offer to "take care of things" for him if he was "a good boy".(DEP.) To determine whether plaintiff suffered a tangible detriment, courts consider whether 1) plaintiff suffered a material loss and 2) the loss…