Positive liberty

54). Liberalism is about the liberty individuals have to use reason when trying to peruse their interests, and most importantly the responsibility individuals should take for their own lives (Mintz et al., 2013, p.54). Thus, liberalism is closely associated with limited government (Badger, 2011), one that is established for “the protection of life, liberty, and property” (Mintz et al., 2013, p.56). Thus, concerning the…

Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby…

Are there significant ideological differences between Canada’s Conservatives and Liberals? Compare the two parties in terms of basic principles of their programs. Differences Between Canada’s Conservatives and Liberals The explanation for what it means to be liberal or conservative comes down to the ideological differences between them. Each party holds a standard to their basic principles and these lists are the primary ideological differences between Canada’s Conservative and Liberal parties…

later than Bentham. Mills wanted to make it more humane. Mills responded to both of the objections in Bentham’s utilitarianism theory. His writings aimed at joining individual rights with the utilitarian theory of greatest happiness. His book, On Liberty, valued the importance of freedom as long it as causes no harm to others. Bentham wanted to maximize utility or happiness in every situation but Mills thinks we should maximize utility in the long run. It will cause greater happiness in the…

was a strong supporter of libertarianism - a group of individuals that identifies justice with liberty; freedom of choice. Nozick proposed that people have a certain moral right, which he called Lockean rights. Lockean rights or “natural rights” was a theory that every man has a right to life, liberty and property. The right to life, meant that everyone is entitled to live. The right to liberty, entitled everyone the right to do anything they wanted, if it did not conflict with others.…

Jean-Jacques Rousseau and John Locke were both philosophers that influenced the Enlightenment during the 17th and 18th centuries. During this time both Rousseau and Locke created and outlined specific concepts of man, and how man lives his life in society; in doing this, both Rousseau and Locke defined different ideas of property and its purpose in society. Using the texts of Rousseau and Locke, and each philosopher’s divergent definitions of property, laws, and government it is possible to…

Arendt’s Freedom and Social Contract of Rousseau Freedom has been defined in many different ways by many different theorists. People in our modern world usually think of freedom as the ability to do what you want and to be treated as an equal to other people. In other words, these people are strong believers that everyone has free will. Not only to do what we want, but to be able to think and speak what we feel as well, without limitation. But the philosopher Hannah Arendt views this idea of…

questions rise about bans and restrictions. When harm becomes involved, the issue of hate speech is often debated. The harm principle is the only purpose for with it is morally legitimate for government or public opinion to interfere with anyone’s liberty of action (including speech) is to prevent harm to others. Hate speech can lead to direct harm; it is important to restrict it. Although freedom of speech is important to the way our society is run, limitations need to be set. Without…

government centered on self-government and individual liberty. The Magna Carta, Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, and the U.S. Bill of Rights initiated…

In a society, man is “denied a liberty to judge of, or defend his right” (L53), meaning that if someone harms him in anyway, an elected (or unelected in some instances) judge serves justice, and that judge is the one who determines the right of the man, not the man himself. Thus, that…