Opinion

threat to their freedom. This shows that she has a strong opinion of facial recognition system, which she thinks people should not give up their liberty for the safety which facial recognition system promises. According to what Kaminer…

dissenting opinions and utility of the Bluebook. Dissenting opinions are purposeful and worth reading. This is because the law is not static; it changes with the evolution of society. Therefore what might be a minority opinion today may become a majority opinion in the future. The remainder of the class was spent lecturing on the utility of the Bluebook, which provides all of the rules for a systematic citation form for legal sources. I will follow that order in this paper. Dissenting…

Kennedy, and Justice Souter. Justices O’Connor, Kennedy and Souter wrote the majority opinion. The majority opinion upheld that parental consent, informed consent and a 24 hour waiting period were all constitutional. It negated the spousal notification clause stating that it placed an undue burden on women seeking an abortion if they are married. Justices Blackmun and Stevens wrote the concurring opinion. In their opinion they agreed with decision to negate spousal notification, however they did…

However, when it came to expressing views publicly either online, or in person, their opinion abruptly switches to not an option and to remain silent. The NSA leak aligns completely as an example model of the Spiral of Silence concept. The threat of isolation aspect makes it difficult for the individual to argue against the surveillance…

relativist would find a way to argue that these undeniable truths are not necessarily true, rather they are simply opinions. This is the main difference between a philosopher and a relativist. A philosopher is after the absolute truth, and they don’t let anything get in the way of finding it; while a relativist is concerned with not offending anyone, and letting them hold their own opinions as the truth. Philosophy’s goal is to find out, and raise questions as to what the undeniable truth is…

inquiry because there is nothing to describe. The things people on this path know is nothing. The Goddess said, “The one on which mortals, knowing nothing, wander.” What they know does not exist. This path is self-serving and based on their own opinions of what they want something to be. They repeatedly confuse being and not being, changing their subjective belief to fit their narrative. These people believe physical is eternal and do not even have a sense of what is.…

his life is Mr. Harrison’s. Despite the doctors and nurse opinions and medical…

can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

and that, to begin to understand how they diverge, four distinctions must be considered (p.302). In the first place, Mills notes that the ratio of people who voice their opinion versus those who receive them differs greatly (p.302). Moreover, the public and the mass don’t have the same power " […] of answering back an opinion without internal or external reprisals being taken" (p.302). By this, Mills means that, people, depending on where they find themselves on the scale of public to mass,…

but do not make people develop an opinion about you. Even if people do develop opinions about you based on your speech, these might not be bad things.…