Ontological argument

Another comparable problem with the Descartes ontological argument is that in light of the fact that one knows a perfect Gods nature as having essential existence, it doesn't take after that God is in a condition of existence. This is on the grounds that something that exist; cannot as a matter of course is…

Anselm is best known for the arguments he provided in regards to the existence of God. He especially contributed to what today is known as the “ontological argument”, or an argument about the state of existing or being. Anselm provides many reasonable arguments for the existence of God, and had an avid ability to explain reason behind it. Through Cur Deus Homo, he tries to rationalize God’s method for saving the world through Christ’s death as satisfaction, Anselm has been able to offer a…

The ontological argument is theory of God based on reasoning alone. The word ‘ontological’ means ‘being’ or ‘exist’. The ontological argument states that God does indeed exist because he is the thought of God can be conceived. The argument was first proposed by Anselm of Canterbury, a monk and christian philosopher. Anselm believed that God was the greatest being conceived and that there was no other being more powerful than God. According to Anselm, if something is perfect, then it couldn’t…

with the ontological argument for god’s existence? Why or why not? 1. Introduction For the vast majority of human history our intellectual power has been directed at trying to prove the existence of gods, I will be looking at an argument for god/s existence called the Ontological argument. I will start by giving the history of this argument and how it was built, and then I will be giving my own personal opinion on the ontological argument. 2.1 What is an ontological argument? The ontological…

The ontological argument is different than the cosmological or teleological arguments as it relies on A Priori knowledge rather than A Posteriori. A Priori knowledge is knowledge that you can know prior to any experience; it is known through reason alone. This essay will explore how reliable the ontological argument is. The ontological argument is an argument for the existence of god by St Anselm (1033-1109). Anselm defined god as “that than which nothing greater can be conceived.” His argument…

specifically in this case, the entities that exist and the logic encompassing such thought. Therefore, an ontological argument is an argument that appeals to a being or an essence of a thing. Often, ontological arguments are unclear as to what the answer, or even, question is exactly; thus leaving the arguments open to thought, reflection, discussion and debate for centuries to follow. Anslem’s ontological argument for the existence of God can be summarized in five points. The first statement is…

is most commonly referred to as the Ontological Argument. He talks about how he believes God to be the greatest, highest, and most powerful being to ever exist in the universe. He believes that there is absolutely no possibility that there is any being that can be seen as being greater than God in any way, shape, or form. The Ontological Argument is a very good argument when trying to persuade others to believe in God, however there are some faults to the argument. It is hard to truly believe…

, And what does that mean for us. The Arguments for Gods existence comes in many forms. Like opinions, some comes from history, personal experiences, different beliefs, and some comes from science. These arguments have been going on for more than thousands of years. And over time that is when other well known religions have come about. When other religions come we then ask ourselves which do we actually religion do we actually follow. Different arguments support different things and if there…

In his Critique, Kant tolls a progression of arguments identified with the distinction in the middle of analytic and synthetic judgments that specifically assault the believability of the premises of the argument. Analytic judgments will be judgments wherein the data of the premise is now inside the premise. (ex. All bachelors are unmarried). They are tautologies and give no new…

In this paper I will dispute that Anselm’s ontological argument is dependent on Anselm’s personal faith in God. My argument lies within the premises that Anselm offers, it would not be rationally acceptable to create content of a maximally perfect being unless the person already accepted the Christian faith. The premises for Anselm’s argument can only be held if the only conception of non greater (relative to his attributes and worldly design) is God but if one does not follow such religious…