Not proven

showed us all that decisions should not be implemented based on stereotypes and that every possible factor should be taken into consideration. In the eyes of these twelve unique personalities, this nineteen year old young man was certainly guilty until proven…

confidence (or certainty), is what gave way to error. Most people try to come up with a correct answer or solution when they face doubt, which is exactly what the jurors did. In the American criminal system, those charged with crimes need to be proven guilty 'beyond a reasonable doubt.' Juror #8 was able to put enough doubt into their minds, by discovering contradicting points in the evidence, to prove to them that they could not be certain enough to convict the defendant. In the beginning,…

Karin Moore, a law professor at Florida A&M University in Orlando. The defense attacked the prosecution on the forensic evidence throughout the case because the body was too decomposed. They could not even determine the cause of death. Innocent until proven guilty. There are many questions regarding the verdict that was read on July 5, 2011 Not Guilty. Find out how the juror was selected and how long it took. What did the jurors do? What did the jurors not do? Juror number three Jennifer Ford…

the young man stabbing his father. Even with this evidence juror number eight brought up the idea to the other jurors that the defendant may be not guilty. He used many of the persuasive techniques that were taught this semester to get his point proven to the other jurors. This juror was respectful from the start,…

provided strong evidence to support their claim. Juror Four and Juror Eight are similar in the way that they are both open-minded, take the trial seriously, and they also use logic to analyze problems. Throughout the play, Juror 4 and Juror 8 has proven themselves to be very open-minded. They are able to take constructive opinions from others…

The biggest pieces of evidence of the state are they proven unreliable stories of Jay Wilds and this call. Nisha does not know Jay so Adnan must have called him while they were in the car according to Jay's story Adnan was in the car and not the library but there's one problem that Nisha repeatedly tells the…

Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior…

SYNOPSIS OF EK RUKA HUA FAISLA Ek Ruka Hua Faisla is movie about a young boy who is on trail for the murder of his father. The 12 jury members are given the job to determine whether the boy is guilty or not. In the following paragraphs all the personality traits of the 12 jury members will be analyzed and also when , which jury member used which thinking hat will be discussed in detail. PERSONALITY ASSISMENT JUROR 1 (DEEPAK KEJRIWAL) Deepak Kejriwal was the co-ordinator. His work was…

The Tall Man The innocence of the police is questioned when a shocking event happened, an Aboriginal man Cameron Doomadgee was found dead in custody. The Tall Man brings to light the events of his death, writes Natasha Dos Santos. The Tall Man aims to unveil the truth of Cameron Doomadgee’s death in police custody. Director Tony Krawitz, chooses specific techniques and archival footage to justify the reason of his death. Chloe Hooper originally published The Tall Man: Death and Life on Palm…

The movie 12 Angry Men the 1957 version directed by Sydney Lumet is a black and white film about twelve men from different backgrounds who are on the same jury, they must decide if a young man is guilty of an act of murder committed upon his father. If found guilty the boy will be put in the electric chair until death, if found innocent, he is set free The juror, I will be looking at is juror number four and how he had a large impact on how new evidence was brought to light and how the evidence…