Nepalese Constituent Assembly election

Far-West,” “United Karnali,” “United Baglung,” etc., supported by Sher Bahadur Deuba and Bhim Rawal. These movements are all status quoists. If it the status quo what they want, then why did not they all fight for converting the existing development regions into provinces? Why the fuss now? Neither do I see much logic in what the Nepali Congress, UML, UCPN (M) and Madhesi Janadhikar Forum (Loktantrik) have proposed – six provinces and their indicative borders. First, six are too many states for the country to sustain. Money will not grow in streets on the morning after the states are created. Too many states will eat up all revenue, leaving virtually nothing for development. Second, the indicative borders are too haphazard. The Constituent Assembly has agreed on a set of criteria based on identity and viability. If you cannot respect all of them in the cruel reality of the country, they should the big parties should have tried to abide by as many of them as possible. However, they did not. If districts in eastern plains can constitute a separate state, why not the districts in the western plains? When you find that there are no governing criteria, anyone can fish in troubled waters. Even though most of the time, I do not agree with Sarita Giri says, this time she has shown female wisdom. She has said that the Madhesi-only province from Saptari to Parsa will be the most backward and asked that the state should preferably border with China as well or at least should…

Fahrenheit). History The history of Nepal has been influenced by its position in the Himalayas and the two country's next to Nepal, India and China. Since the arrival of disparate settlers, Nepal is now a multiethnic, multicultural, multi religion, and multilingual country. Central Nepal was split into three kingdoms from the 15th century until the 18th century. In the 18th century Nepal was re-unified under the Shah monarchy.…