National Wildlife Federation

Some people believe they should be allowed to own exotic pets because they are able to adequately care for them. These people feel it is there right to keep such pets. Should people in the United States be allowed to own exotic pets such as burmese pythons, tigers, and monkeys? Be able to have exotic animals in the U.S.A My reason is that not all people like the basic animals that we can have today,so I think some people would like to have more animals to choose from something different…

Would you want to be held in an enclosed area your whole life and not know what it’s like to live in your own natural environment? Animals deserve to live in their own environment remaining untouched. My uncle once had a pet alligator and an exotic snake. His life was at risk all the time until he finally got rid of it properly. These animals are becoming endangered and it’s our fault. This must end. Keeping exotic animals can be a very big risk to your health and others near you. What would…

The United States has always gone by a federal system of government where there are two tiers: state and national. Americans have always believed this is the best way to run a nation however, it can be proven that a unitary government can work just as well if not better. There is a trend in statistics of federal and unitary governments that proves the overall health of a nation is higher in a unitary government. These factors include life expectancy, infant mortality, and access to drinking…

issues, finding the proper balance between the two has proven to be more nuanced than some people would expect. In the U.S. the federal balance of power has evolved throughout history. Federalism in its most basic form is division of power between national and state…

Interest groups exist in order to protect the people within their groups in many ways including through influencing governments. These groups exist for everything from aboriginal issues, to peace, and women’s issues. Within the concept of “interest groups”, they are split up into categories:“economic” or “non-economic”. Economic groups work for professional or personal gain, compared to groups that instead focus solely on goods that help society as a whole rather than individual people. Some…

government may seem plausible, a Confederate government is best suited for America because it ensures fortified units/states, encourages nationwide cooperation, and establishes equality on all levels. A federalist government is characterized by a strong national government working with local governments. Contrary to popular belief, America’s achievements, such as the advancing human rights,…

congress had trouble passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed (Doc 1). Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expense of the national government (Doc 2). Also the states refused to give the national government enough power to work correctly.…

POG 100 - PROPOSAL This proposal will rebuttal against the resolved issue of Week 6: “State break up is better than federalism in resolving internal state conflict.” Neither the concepts of economic dispute nor social injustice can fully explain the cause of state breakups. This essay argues the reasons why state breakup is not better than federalism to resolve state conflict because it leaves a majority of negative impacts, such as, corruption of state, revocation of citizenship rights and…

constitution because it lacked taxing authority, uniformity of currency, denied the power to regulate foreign trade and interstate commerce, No enforcement of law, and it created an ineffective way to vote by state. The Articles were written to keep the national government weak and soon became apparent as the Articles came into effect. The only way it could be changed was for it to be replaced by what is now known as the Constitution. Lacking in taxing authority, the articles of…

government formed under the Articles of confederation is considered a failure, because it had minimal powers, did not have a chief executive or national court, and could not effectively raise funds for the national treasury. The biggest fear of the delegates at the Second Continental Congress was government overreach, and tyranny. Therefore, they felt that the national government’s powers needed to be severely limited with the congress not having the power to enforce any of its rulings.…