Moral

Moral relativism is a view that moral or ethical standards are different for each person and that no one’s opinion of right and wrong is better than another. Moral relativism is said to be “the view that ethical standards, morality, and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person's individual choice” (moral-relativism.com). What is right for them is what they believe to be ethical. Since moral relativism is culturally based, different cultures will have…

The theories of Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivism are quite different. In Moral Relativism, what is right and what is wrong is not set in stone, each person and each culture can have it’s own definition of right and wrong. Moral Objectivism states that there is no variation in right and wrong and that right and wrong is set across all people, cultures, and time periods. David Hume’s theory fits in with Moral Relativism. Hume’s Sentimentalism is based off of the idea that feelings, passion…

Moral relativism is a very vague and unclear moral theory, this leaves many questioning the significance of the theory. The topic of moral relativism is very confusing and the thought process behind the theory is muddled. It is wrong to assert that there is no standard of morality, that morality is made truth through an individual’s view on right and wrong. This means no person’s morality is better than another. So judgment cannot be given in any situation and no change would occur due to the…

There is a place for emotion within moral reasoning, in fact emotions are essential in the process of gaining moral understanding. Morality consists of principles that tell individuals how they ought to treat one another regarding what is considered right and wrong. To truly understand one another, we must understand each other’s emotions. Feelings are most commonly associated with women since men make most rational decisions and ideas, and as a result, these decisions are flawed to an extent.…

preference. Decision making is a difficult subject to completely understand, one would have to understand how each individual brain works and processes information. Poncie Rutsch created an article titled "Men and Women Use Different Scales to Weigh Moral Dilemmas", which talked about going back in time and asked what someone would do given the opportunity to kill Hitler before he came to power. Women were more…

argue that moral paradoxes do exist, and everyone will eventually face one. My argument proceeds by analyzing the definition of a paradox, looking at real life examples, and discussing how we try to make our decisions. At some point in life, everyone will face a moral paradox. Although there is controversy over whether such things exist, we look to the definition of a paradox for the answer. One of the elements of a paradox is a seemingly unacceptable conclusion. When the dilemma is moral, the…

PHI2600 Ethics Research Project Paper Abbie Guile Moral Relativism, Emrys Westacott Morals have many components that play into what is considered right or wrong, and this is where moral relativism comes in. Moral relativism is the standpoint of where the morals are coming from. This gives us more of an explanation to where individual’s morals originate from and help us understand them. An example of this could be someone’s culture, because his or her standpoint is different from someone that…

When a threat becomes apparent in society, the members of a community may result to moral panic. In Christie Barron and Dany Lacombe’s “Moral Panic and the Nasty Girl.” They examine the topic of female violence in the 1990s and societies reaction to the murder case of Reena Virk and the notorious couple Paul Bernardo and Karla Homolka crimes that were committed. Barron and Lacombe explain the Nasty Girl is a social construct that has been formed in the perception of fear and risk in the…

1. INTRODUCTION The Rational Interaction and Moral Sensitivity model (RIMS), is a model which is used to help in making decisions between issues that may morally contradict each other particularly if the right choice is not so obvious. The aforementioned strategy has increasingly been used as a model strategy particularly when taking into consideration the various interests, conflicting or not, of all parties when solving various moral dilemmas. In the following essay the author shall thus…

to choose between moral absolutism and moral relativism as a guide that the American society should use for making moral decisions. Both moral relativism and moral absolutism offer solutions to moral problems, but each will give completely different answers to the problem. Many great philosophers in history have debated on one side or another. In my opinion I side with the anthropologist Ruth Benedict and believe relativism is the better way to think and the best choice for moral decision-making…