Moral

Most people would base their moral stance on abortion on exactly when they believe ‘life’ begins; and when a foetus consequently becomes a person. However, the absence of an empirically determined timescale means that anybody’s guess is valid here, and so unless one side can produce an argument that is equally relevant regardless of whether the foetus is human yet, debates on the topic are essentially reduced to ‘yes-no’ level quarrels. Thompson (A Defence of Abortion, 1971) made an attempt at…

Harper Lee discusses tough moral topics like racism and prejudice views, through the eyes of a child. The character Scout demonstrates a child’s obligation to pursue morality. But a child’s moral obligations depend on their moral foundation. Because children are naïve, they see situations ingenuously, unlike adults imbued with prejudice or racist ideas. Because Scout is a child she has that sense of naivety but can be more accountable for what she does because of the moral foundation. In light…

Levels of Kohlberg's stages of Moral Development The first level is the moral/ preconvention. The moral values in this stage are inherent in the quasi-physical and external events. Here, people are supposed to adhere to the rules and assess the labels and regard them regarding the unpleasant or pleasant actions (Shaffer,2004). This level has three stages. The stages include obedience and orientation of punishment, naively egoistic adjustment and current stage. These steps can be incorporated…

Moral relativism- The idea of moral relativism is one that morality is relevant to your situation, and that you should be accepting other people's morals and cultures. Moral relativism can first be seen in the colonies, mainly by the quakers in pennsylvania, and quakers were also vehemently against slavery, which was another morally relativistic idea. Moral absolutism- The idea that there is a clear right and wrong and that right and wrong is the same for every situation, and the idea has had…

plethora of moral diversity examples to support his defense on moral relativism, a mistake already persists in his claim for defending it. Harman claims that all moral right and wrong are always relative to a choice of moral framework. This claim proposes an absolute moral standard. It is illogical for one to propose a relativist’s claim by using an absolute moral standard. Therefore, the relativist’s claim is illogical. To add on to this argument for endorsing an absolutist attitude, despite…

Morals are a set of beliefs or choices that one would define which is right or wrong. When one says that a moral action requires the ability to make moral choices is similar to how we make our own choices. For something to happen within our lives, we must decide whether to initiate the action or to refrain from it. In other words, we would either do or do not. An action cannot be initiated by itself as it must have another force behind it. This concept is similar to a game, one must input…

morally right for him or her. Meanwhile, the moral code is also different from cultures to cultures, which…

Moral luck occurs whenever luck makes a moral difference in two or more cases. The problem of moral luck arises from a conflict between the widely held intuition that moral luck should not occur in moral judgment with the fact that it is arguably impossible to prevent it from happening. Before getting into the problem which luck occurs and makes a moral difference, let’s look at a case to test an intuition. Suppose, there is a person A behind me who is tripped by the uneven floor, and the person…

Daniel Merritt Melinda Mansour Philosophy 100-008 20/12/16 1422 Moral Obligations We as humans have moral obligations to help human beings less fortunate than us. Peter singer offers this approach in his essay and supports that us humans must help the needy by donating to charity because it is a moral obligation. I totally agree with this viewpoint because having people on the streets starving with no shelter is a bad sight. Humans have the ability to prevent starvation and suffering by…

Moral relativism is the view that ethical judgments are valid or false just in respect to some specific viewpoint and that no point of view is particularly favored over all others. It has frequently been related with different cases about profound quality: eminently, the proposal that distinctive societies regularly show fundamentally extraordinary good esteems; the refusal that there are all inclusive good esteems shared by each human culture; and the request that we should avoid passing good…