Mariam Appeal

A man was enticed to Australia from the USA to be the spiritual head of the Greek Orthodox community of South Australia. He remained in that position for 20 years and upon his resignation, a dispute arose over his annual leave and service leave entitlements. The church refused to pay it and the Archbishop brought an action against the church on a foundation that an employment relationship had existed. The central issue before the court was whether or not the Archbishop or the orthodox community…

Complainant, who is African-American, alleges that Respondent Argo Tea (Argo Tea) denied him full use of a public accommodation based on his race. Complainant further alleges that Respondent Chicago Park District (Park District), who is the owner of the land, failed to monitor its agreement with Argo Tea to allow the public entry without making purchases, and effectively discriminated against him based on his race. As background, Complainant states that Argo Tea entered into an agreement in…

requested for an advice regarding a successful appeal against the client conviction of a criminal offence in the District Court of Queensland; due to the trial judge’s exercise of s15 (1) of the Evidence Act 1977 (Qld). Your question, my answer to your question, the background of and the rationality behind my answer are presented below. Question and Answer: Q. Due to the developments in relation to Chapter III of the Australian Constitution, would an appeal against a conviction - that was…

As the trier of law, the Judge is obligated to weigh the competing needs of society, and conclude in a manner that results in the most justifiable satisfaction. However, due to the polar requirements of different individuals, the court may not be able to please every member of society. This juxtaposition of society’s needs is displayed in the case of R v Howard, where, although actus reus was proved, justice was not had for the accused, showcasing the nuance of law in Canada. On October 17,…

Tennessee law allows eligible persons the ability to have criminal records expunged under certain conditions (Guide to Expungement in Tennessee, n.d.). These conditions include the following: • Dismissal of charges • Returned as “no true bill” by a grand jury • Arrest and release without having been charged • Trail resulting in a not guilty verdict • Case resulting in nolle prosequi • Cases where an order of protection was successfully defended and denied by a court following a hearing (Guide…

Life experiences are a very good way to present an argument especially political arguments. It gives the speaker more credibility, appeals to the emotions of the audience, and makes his/her argument more logical. Using a life experience as evidence in a political argument is known as an “autobiographical political argument.” Doron Taussig analyzes the use of this type of argument in a series of blogs entitled We are the 99 percent and We are the 53 percent. From his readings it would seem that…

shooting or by freezing to death. With all this religious persecution and time of mass chaos, the church was weak if existent at all. Note that the already religious personnel were not weak but the church was weakened by the massacres. Solzhenitsyn appeals to ethos when he starts the paragraph by showing his background, specifically when he states that he read hundreds of books and read interviews (Solzhenitsyn, 1970), with this statement he tries to show that he is knowledgeable by saying he…

computer system and transfer same to David Nosal. While former colleagues had authorization to access the confidential data, the company policy at KFI prohibited divulging such information. Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge for the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court wrote the appellate court’s ruling for the en banc panel. ISSUE: Did the defendant and the co-defendants “exceed[ed] authorized access” under the CFAA when they used valid user names and passwords to gain…

domestic relationship set forth in Family Code section 6211.1 Consider a similar case, the petitioner and appellant, hereon Oriola, appealed the dismissal of a restraining order sought pursuant to the DVPA for a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The appeal asserted the trial court erred in finding there was no dating relationship between Oriola and the respondent, hereon Thaler. The appellate court affirmed the trial court’s ruling, based on Oriola’s pleadings and statements, that it lacked…

court system is organized as followed: district people’s court, the provincial people’s court and the supreme people’s court, which is indubitably similar to the United States court structure: United states district courts, United States court of appeal and the most powerful court; the Supreme court of the united States. In addition to the court structure, the technique of employing the judges and their terms in office is highly similar between the…