Mariam Appeal

This court considered the Third District Court of Appeals decision to enforce the Clause Arbitration agreement. The court disagreed with the verdict to enforce the Clause, arguing that the Third District Court of Appeals did not employ the Seifert standard established as a precedent in evaluating motion to compel arbitration agreements (Basulto v. Hialeah, 2014). Additionally, the court found the Third District Court of Appeals’ decision to enforce the arbitration clause under the Federal…

Oyinkansola Lapite January 28th 2016 MFC 483 Case Title and Citation: United States of America v.Juan Manuel Contento-Pachon, 723 F.2d 691 Relevant Case Facts: The defendant Juan Manuel Pachon received a job offered from one of his passenger named Jorge to be a driver of a privately own car. Pachon expressed an interest in the job and decided to meet both Jorge and the owner of the car. The next day Jorge proposed…

Particular circumstances can deny a defendant from asserting a germane counterclaim. In Giambuttista v. Bradlees, Inc., 130 N.J. Super. 381 (Super. Ct. 1974), the court denied a defendant’s counterclaim due to it being barred by the statute of limitations and prejudicing the plaintiff’s rights since a medial investigation was involved. In that case, the plaintiff had filed assault and battery charges against defendant shopkeeper and defendant employee. Id. at 382. An attorney for the defendant…

Anagnostou v. Anagnostou Case No. 2017-017244 FC 12 Husband’s Answer to Wife’s Amended Verified Counter- Petition for Dissolution of Marriage IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN RE: THE MARRIAGE OF: FAMILY DIVISION CASE NO. 2017-017244 FC 12 GEORGE ANAGNOSTOU, Husband, And, KATE LEANN ANAGNOSTOU, Wife. _____________________________/ HUSBAND’S ANSWER TO WIFE’S AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISSOLUTION OF…

To make a new rule OSHA would first draft a proposed rule then publish the proposed rule in the Federal Registry where the public can review the new rule and comment on it. The agency (OSHA) must allow ample time for comments to be submitted on the rule then they must consider any and all significant and relevant comments and provide a response to those comments, be it a change in the rule or an explanation as to why the rule will stay the way it was drafted. If the agency changes the proposed…

ADJUDICATORY HEARING ORDER PENDING DISPOSITION Upon consideration of the evidence presented at an adjudicatory hearing, and with the following persons present:  Respondent Marquise Ramon Bailey  Respondent’s Attorney Leslie Florestano Peek  Assistant State’s Attorney Kue M. Lattimore The Court for Prince George’s County on this 9th day of April, 2015, accepted the Respondent’s plea to Count 7 – Motor Vehicle Theft. The Court found that the Respondent freely and voluntarily…

Pursuant to Rule 59.04, Husband argues that the Court should alter or amend the Final Decree of Divorce concerning the following issues: (1) imputation of income to Husband; and (2) the Permanent Parenting Plan. The Court finds these requests are devoid of merit. The purpose of a Rule 59.04 motion to alter or amend a judgement is to provide the trial court with an opportunity to correct errors before the judgement becomes final. In re M.L.D., 182 S.W.3d 890, 895 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005) (citing…

I recently had an opportunity to perform an informative interview with William Payne of Payne Law. I am pursuing my AAS degree in Legal Administrative Office Systems, and wanted more information on what was really happening when they weren’t in front of the court systems. I am in a Legal Terminology class, and really wished to combine what I am currently learning here, with what I’m planning for my future. After this interview I felt more prepared for what is to come in later years. I’m more…

Summary of Facts The Plaintiff and the Defendant had been friends for many years before this incident. They are both musicians and both have helped each other out when it came to their careers. When the Plaintiff stated that if someone needed help on a track then he would ask the Defendant to come and join in. The same instance goes for the Defendant; if he needed help with a track or anything he would go to his then friend the Plaintiff. When the Plaintiff asked for help from the Defendant…

Case: Schulz v. Kroger Co.., 963 N.E. 2d 1141 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012) Facts: The Schulzes are appealing the trial court’s summary judgement in favor of Kroger Co., and their knowledge or the existence of any hazardous conditions in its store. Procedural History: Customer, Dixie Schulz allegedly slipped over clear liquid and fell, brought premisis-liability action against Kroger. The Hendricks Superior Court, Karen M. Love, J., granted Kroger’s motion for summary judgement. Customer appealed.…