Legal positivism

The plaintiff of this particular case was charged with theft by the court because he stole a water softer from home depot to provide for his family because he did not have the proper funds to do so himself. The plaintiff's arguments to why he had committed the crime was because of his financial state at the time that he had committed the criminal offense, he stated to the court that he himself was previously a drug addict himself but stopped after he was put and jail and released. During his…

UNOS stands United Network for Organ Sharing is a private organization that's not for any profit what so ever manages the organ transplant system in service for the federal government. UNOS help many people get these organs they need to save their lives. They help match people with organs at first with their factors they do match up against what they don't. Those factors being blood type, height, weight and other medical relevance things connected to organ transplantation. Geography figures…

Written Assignment: Business Structure The following is a thorough analysis of how a specific business structure would be a quality pairing for a Christian based subsidiary for an existing sport or entertainment organization. Consequently, before one can even begin to understand the complexity of the relationship between business structures and subsidiaries, there has to be a finite understanding of what a subsidiary is along with what, type of business structure is needed. A subsidiary can…

Case: Ewing v. California, 583 U.S. 11 (2003) — Facts: George Ewing walked into a pro shop of a Los Angeles County golf course where he concealed and stole three golf clubs priced at $399 a piece. Aside from this incident, Ewing had several prior convictions, four of which were serious, violent, and/or felonious. In this case, Ewing was convicted of felony grand theft and sentenced to 25 years to life under California’s three-strike law. Procedural History: the California Court of Appeal and…

In this particular case, Bradley Smith sued Del Lago Partners, Inc. and Del Lago Partners, L.P., for the injuries he sustained when a fight broke out among customers at the Grandstand Bar, which is part of the respondents’ resort. Smith obtained both a skull fracture and brain damage. He sued De Lago on the premises-liability platform. After nine days of hotly disputed evidence, I would say both Smith and De Lago won on a 49-51 percent liability apportionment. Reducing Smith’s damages by the…

• P alleges assault and false arrest. P alleges that she, her sister Indira Alvarez (non-party) and other family members were involved in a brawl with Nairoby Cruz and Tanairy Cruz, sisters, (non-parties). P claims that Tanairy Cruz had early insulted Indira in a store. P claims that during the fight she was punched in the face, hit in the head and chest. P claims that during the fight an individual pushed her against the gate for approximately 5 minutes. P claims that during the fight Nairoby…

this is a matter involving Kenneth Taheny against Marque Millennium Capital Management, LLC. The matter involves a note/loan provided by Mr. Taheny to Marque. On October 11, 2013, a default judgment was issued by the Honorable Elizabeth Emerson of The Supreme Court of Suffolk County in the amount of $135,258.71 plus interest through the day of collection. The notice of default had been served on Mr. Meckel, the President Chairman and -- to the best of my knowledge -- sole shareholder of…

On 10/16/2015, CM met with the client and completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. CM inquires the reason client couldn’t meet with CM on 10/13/2015. Client reported she got caught up with her recycling bottles. She mentioned this area the supermarket close at 7pm and she travel to Malcolm X. she also mentioned having problem at two different supermarket with the store manager. In the meeting client as usual was very talkative and cooperative. She appears her stage age and she appropriately dressed for…

The plaintiffs, mother and little baby girl, claim for false detainment by the defendants in their jewellery shop in downtown Victoria on July 4, 1992. The defendants deny the asserted detainment, guaranteeing that they told the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves she was allowed to leave the business premises. The defendants counterclaim against the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves for defamation emerging out of a record of the occurrence given by her to the daily paper correspondents and which showed up in a…

Reasonover is not bound to the clause. The Federal Arbitration Act regulates arbitration of disputes which are subject to arbitration clauses. Even though the FAA has put in place a policy favoring arbitration, it is first necessary to determine whether the parties actually entered into an agreement to arbitrate disputes. Reasonover subscribed to a seven day trial period with Clearwire. The modem was shipped to her via FedEx, however when the package was attempted to be delivered she was…