Legal death

Hart-Fuller debate doesn’t just full on disagree with each other, but come to an understanding on certain aspects. A positivist (Hart in this debate) believes that morals and principles should not and do not coincide with law making and law decisions. Legal rights and moral rights are not interrelated, it’s just a sheer chance the two overlap. Hart considers the process of determining cases through reason or assumption…

this is a matter involving Kenneth Taheny against Marque Millennium Capital Management, LLC. The matter involves a note/loan provided by Mr. Taheny to Marque. On October 11, 2013, a default judgment was issued by the Honorable Elizabeth Emerson of The Supreme Court of Suffolk County in the amount of $135,258.71 plus interest through the day of collection. The notice of default had been served on Mr. Meckel, the President Chairman and -- to the best of my knowledge -- sole shareholder of…

On 10/16/2015, CM met with the client and completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. CM inquires the reason client couldn’t meet with CM on 10/13/2015. Client reported she got caught up with her recycling bottles. She mentioned this area the supermarket close at 7pm and she travel to Malcolm X. she also mentioned having problem at two different supermarket with the store manager. In the meeting client as usual was very talkative and cooperative. She appears her stage age and she appropriately dressed for…

The plaintiffs, mother and little baby girl, claim for false detainment by the defendants in their jewellery shop in downtown Victoria on July 4, 1992. The defendants deny the asserted detainment, guaranteeing that they told the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves she was allowed to leave the business premises. The defendants counterclaim against the plaintiff Joanne Jeeves for defamation emerging out of a record of the occurrence given by her to the daily paper correspondents and which showed up in a…

Reasonover is not bound to the clause. The Federal Arbitration Act regulates arbitration of disputes which are subject to arbitration clauses. Even though the FAA has put in place a policy favoring arbitration, it is first necessary to determine whether the parties actually entered into an agreement to arbitrate disputes. Reasonover subscribed to a seven day trial period with Clearwire. The modem was shipped to her via FedEx, however when the package was attempted to be delivered she was…

On Thursday, February 18th 2016 I attended multiple court hearings at the Marion County Courthouse in Marion, OH. In this particular court-house there are two common pleas court rooms along with two judges which include Judge Slagle and Judge Finnegan. I felt it necessary to observe both courtrooms of the courthouse to get the most out of this experience. Judge Finnegan’s courtroom was much larger than Judge Slagle’s but seemed to have been more out of date compared to Slagle’s courtroom. In…

In the case McNabb v. Bay Village Club Condominium Assoc. The plaintiff argues that there was hydraulic oil outside the elevator doors that he did not see. After he fell he saw that the oil was seeping from under the door of a machine next to the elevator. The puddle of oil was about four or five feet wide . Two witnesses said they saw the oil there, and one of the witnesses reported it to the maintenance man. Another witness didn’t notice any footprints in the oil. Lastly the elevator was…

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) expresses the desire of Imagine Perfect Care (IPC) to enter into an agreement with those parties receiving financial support from IPC in the form of seed funding, for project development. Specifically the project receiving support is: Project Name: _____________________________________________________________. The purpose of this memorandum is an expression of the involved parties to enter into an agreement with Imagine Perfect…

According to the case of Christie v. Dobbyn2, it is not essential for the plaintiff to prove that the defendant knew if the dog is of a vicious or mischievous nature. Plaintiff Uniqua does not have to prove if Bob’s dog was harmful by nature or had bitten any other person in the past. By looking at the Donahue v. Belitski case, plaintiff went to the defendant property and was bitten by the dog and in this case, defendant was responsible for the damages in doctrine of scienter and negligence.…

3. Describe the specific steps you would take in responding to the subpoena. A. I would first contact the legal representation of my school district who may be able to get a motion to quash (reject or void) the subpoena (ASCA, FAQ). B. I would then inform the school district’s attorney that I do not have any information to help the case (ASCA, FAQ). C. I would explain that my obligations are to Danielle (ASCA, FAQ). D. I also would cite my ethical standards, which support me in safeguarding…