Legal codes

Edelweiss Tokio Life – Protection – Overview Edelweiss Tokio Life – Protection is a non-linked, non-participating, term insurance plan. This pure protection plan offers complete protection to the loved ones in the event of the demise of the life insured (primary breadwinner of the family). This cost friendly solution allows the family to realise their dreams and maintain the same lifestyle even in the absence of the life insured. It provides a lump sum amount to the nominee on the death of the…

connection between law and morality. As a matter of fact, it is obvious that as Hart is a legal positivist, he is claiming that there is not a necessary connection between law and morality but a contingent one . Nevertheless, even if there is a possible connection…

Joseph S. Roth’s wrote an inspiring essay called “Encourage the Golden Rule of Organ Donations, Transplant Coverage,” that provides crucial information on the significance of organ donation. In the essay, Roth incorporates his proposal, the Golden Rule, which permits health insurers to limit transplant coverage for patients who refuse to be organ donors. The legislation would require insurance companies to provide information at each policy renewal about how their policy holders can register to…

‘The interpretation of the law falls within the function of the Judiciary,’ like within the case of the Queen v. Dudley and Stephens. This responsibility that the judges and lords have when preceding over cases, particularly ‘hard cases’, has resulted in several different theories developed to aid the judge. One of which is the positivist school of judicial reasoning associated with the work of Austin and Hart, and a counterpart of Dworkin’s interpretive model. Lord Coleridge’s verdict in the…

a few differences between natural law and legal positivism. However, before diving into the differences, a definition for both the theories should be provided. Basically, a natural law is a law in which is derived from the validity of morality and reasoning. Natural law is believed to be served on the best interest of the common good as well. For legal positivism, it is viewed in the source of a law has no connection between reasoning and morality. A legal positivism should be from an…

In Missouri, there is a strong presumption against the hostile element of adverse possession in cases of co-tenancy. See Mann v. Mann, 353 Mo. 619, 622, 183 S.W.2d 557, 558 (1944). To overcome this presumption, the claimant must establish that he acted in a way that was irreconcilable with their co-tenant’s possessory interest. See Golden v. Tyler, 180 Mo. 196, 204 (1904). Though it is not necessary to show actual notice to the co-tenant, the claimant must demonstrate intent to solely possess…

Marketing has the 4 Ps which are product, price, placement and promotion. In the insurance industry, the products are the policy documents, the wordings of which are fixed and cannot be changed by any insurance company. Placement and promotion of the insurance products is almost same for all companies and thus the main aspect to be considered is price. Due to the cut throat competition and price being fixed and non-negotiable, the insurance companies then have two option in front of them, which…

In the case of Jeb and Josh a business entity that might be appropriate would be a Partnership. A partnership is easy to form, and generally does not require an official or written agreement to establish it (Kubasek p. 772). This business entity is the relationship existing between two or more persons who co-own business for profit (Kubasek p. 772). Each person contributes money, and expects to share in the profits, losses of the business equally. Unfortunately, with this type of entity, Jeb…

For this professorship, I am proposing the production of a documentary that looks at the issues of environmental racism in 1996 and the attempts by then Governor Foster and the state of Louisiana to violate the constitutional rights of citizens of Convent, Louisiana. Specifically, among other constitutional rights, I will be looking at the violations of First Amendment, specifically the right to free speech and the right to peacefully assemble. Background: In 1998, Robert Kuehn and Oliver…

ARGUMENT I. THE PETITIONER, IN THIS CASE, WAS AN EMPLOYEE OF PLUS BUILDING, INC., AND NOT AN INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Respondent claims that Petitioner Mr. Kroplewski was not an employee of Plus Building, Inc., but an independent contractor. Although there is no rigid rule of law to determine whether an employer-employee relationship exists between parties, such determination depends on the particular facts of the case. The range of factors is considered in making that determination…