Law school

reform. If people kill people then how are these unfit citizens able to obtain guns legally. We live in a society that mental illnesses are extremely prevalent. We also live in a society that a mentally ill person can still obtain a firearm and enter a school or public place and mass murder a high number of individuals. Having people in the world with disorders such as mental illness it is important to have the appropriate rules and regulations to keep that individual and others safe. Therefore,…

Think about the various local governments in Texas. Do you know how much of your property taxes goes where if you own a home? What about school finance, higher education finance, city services, hospital districts. The local governments in Texas are extensions of the state government, that act as administrative arms of the state. The major local governments in Texas are the municipal and the county governments (Maxwell,271). County governments provide governmental services for the benefit of…

stronger gun control laws. The people can gain many benefits from this. The law abiding citizens are still going to be law abiding citizens but criminals will still be criminals. For example in the text it states, “...If they somehow manage to take away legal weapons? That would still leave criminals happily armed.” Therefore this states that criminals will still be criminals and would most likely steal the arms to kill. To explain further some massacres were stopped by law abiding citizens…

to share their personal beliefs in court. There are some rules and laws that must be applied to be able to share personal beliefs. Rules that must be applied for witnesses to be able to speak their opinion.One example is when the evidence of someone's character or character trait is admissible, it can be proved by testimony about the person’s reputation or by testimony in the form of an opinion. (Cornell University Law School) If someone has valid character traits and it can be proved by…

What was the rationale for the justices opinions on the case? To begin with, He argued the the law was not a regulation of commerce. He believed the 10th Amendment gave the power to the states to make rules for child labor. His freedom and property which was protected by the 5th Amendment gave the right to allow his children to work. What were the majority and minority opinions of the Supreme Court? The majority was William Day and the minority was Oliver W. Holmes The background of the case…

O’Neal was employed by the Colton School as a teacher, which was valid though a contractual agreement between these two parties. When O’Neal attempted to replace the original contract with a substitute agreement, he did not follow the correct rules of modification. When the Colton School fired O’Neal for nonperformance, they were acting within the limitations of the law. O’Neal’s later legal action against the Colton school will argue that his condition excused his nonperformance. This, however,…

A Tale of Two Theories: Political Philosophy and Humanism Philosophy “Are not the Confucians rites and the Legalist laws one and the same notion? One could think so, as these rites and laws have the same goal: to regulate the behavior of each individual so as to establish a social order.” China’s modern day success story can be traced back to 6th century B.C.E, when two major philosophies began to shape the culture, Confucianism and Legalism. These philosophical theories equally impacted…

get a job this expectedly important to the federal levels that deals with law enforcement. This includes the people point of view of the law enforcement and how they have come to understand the law enforcement as a whole. So does the requirements education of law enforcement itself in order to go with the changes that are happing around today’s world. This means the level of education is also changing such as a high school diploma or associate 's degree dose no longer…

Supreme Court that schools are learning the same curricular and have the same building…

guidelines for future court cases by setting case precedent. Court rulings are based on interpretations of statutory laws that are created by legislative bodies like Congress or state government; however, when statutory laws are created, it is impossible to anticipate all situations or issues that may come about. When there is conflict, the court system is tasked with interpreting the statutory law when it is unclear. Once courts make a decision, the ruling then becomes a guide for future,…