Justice League

Crito, a friend and follower of Socrates, arrives in his prison cell one day and tries to convince Socrates into escaping. Socrates counters Crito by giving a few arguments as to why he should not escape, yet his arguments could also be disputed in some ways which brings up the question of Socrates intents. For example, his first argument is that he should not escape as it would mean harming someone and you should never harm even if you are harmed first. This could be contradicted with an act of…

Social Foundations I Kyu Hyeon Kim Prompt: Should the ideal political leader want to lead? How would Plato and the Epicureans answer that question? Title: An Innate Drive of Ideal Political Leader to lead the city In this paper, I will argue that the ideal political leaders would like to lead the city from their innate drive. I will describe how the innate drive makes the ideal political leader overcome the conditions that Plato and Epicureans suggested. Before, I disagree with Plato and…

As seen throughout Plato’s Republic, Plato trusts that justice is important for the individuals who are just. We have likewise observed that Plato does not imagine that justice is great exclusively for its outcomes. It is additionally great in itself, an innate good. He demonstrates this by asserting that justice is a part of the happy life. In the event that the ethics were just a significance to happiness, then they may neglect to cause happiness in different conditions, and one may have the…

addresses the overarching concern of what justice is in the city and what justice is in the individual. Despite claims that The Republic goes too far in subordinating the individual and their happiness, the text disproves this because it constantly searches for coinciding concepts of justice within the city and the individual, addresses the benefit of the happy city for the individual, and specifically presents an exchange of Socrates that explains justice is made to benefit all people and not…

Correctness has been synonymous with justice since the arrival of modern law. However, to claim that “justice” is equal to “being correct” is to bastardize the very essence of “correctness”. This is a result of modeling our justice system after our very own sense of what is correct -- what we believe is best for society. But as one might realize, there then appears a flaw with our justice: What if one’s sense of justice does not agree with another’s sense of justice? What if this very issue…

In many societies, including our own, we labeled the meaning of the word “justice” for the sole purpose of preserving social order and the political stability for the good of many instead of the few. However, what we believe to be just and unjust in regards to what Plato’s Republic explains about what is actually just and unjust are inadvertently blurred from a somewhat (if not unintended biased) social perspective; therefore, this topic has produce a generational conflict. These concepts of…

Anybody Will Do Punishing criminals has always been a major part of what is considered justice, as the saying goes an eye for an eye. People naturally lean towards that extremely crude form of justice, and so they care about nothing else besides the fact that they get someone’s eye. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller and “Trial by Fire” by David Grann, extreme actions are taken over the deaths of children. People are accused of causing the deaths, yet none are at fault. They are all killed…

work, but rather took a few concepts and applied them to successfully live a complete life. He believed that if you were a man of truth and justice, you were saved from all ruins, sin, and destruction. In addition, he claimed that just brought self-satisfaction of good moral character in which you acknowledged the idea of limited truth. Plato was so high on justice and truth he said, “Unjust things are worse than killing.” (Apology 30d) Rather than arguing in which killing another human being is…

While explaining the core idea behind legal positivism, Fuller wrote, “The common objectives of all system of [legal] positivism is to preserve a distinction between the law that is and the law that should be or is trying to be.” This distinction between what is and what should be is the foundational idea separating law in the form of constitution and morality based on the distinction between good and bad. By creating a boundary between law and morality, the legal positivists thus try to…

In the Republic, Thrasymachus defines justice as the advantage of the stronger. Socrates refutes this argument by proving that the stronger do not always make decisions to their advantage, that the stronger should not be making decisions that advantage them and that justice is more beneficial to the individual than injustice. In analyzing Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, there are aspects that need to be considered. Firstly, Thrasymachus talks about a group of people – the…