Judgment

Critical examination of the role played by moral judgments in historiography This paper attempts to understand and critically examine the role played by moral judgments in historiography. It also discusses the views held by three prominent historians, i.e., E.H. Carr, Marc Bloch, and R.G. Collingwood on this topic. One of the long standing and important issues in the philosophy of history is the permissibility or desirability of moral judgments. Historians in our own time continue to be wary…

If one dares ask a question that examines or critiques Trump, prepare to be attacked. This will only get worse as his ascendancy continues. However, if you laud Trump with praise, he will elevate you to a place of honor, exactly corresponding to Daniel 11:39. This is presently happening as people sell their soul and surrender their principles to join the Trump Train. Buddy up to him and he will treat you wonderfully. But challenge him at your own peril. The last part of the verse says, “he’ll…

There are several errors in judgment that individuals make on a day to day basis. Everyone is guilty of making these errors regardless of their background, education, and life experiences. The common errors of judgment found in humans that I chose are Snap Judgment, Projection, and Sweeping Generalizations (Bethel University, 2013). Snap Judgment is a common error that I recognize or experience probably most often. An example would be the cop shootings on “innocent citizens”. The media and…

he was determined that we make these judgments, although there was a constant question of how these judgments are possible. A synthetic judgment, by description, is derived from familiarity but a priori entails independence of understanding. (Stumpf pg. 276) Kant illustrated that in several subjects such as: ethics, physics, mathematics, and metaphysics that we do make decisions including synthetics with a priori. For instance, 8 plus 3 equals 11 as judgment is a priori because it obtains the…

Courts in Nevada have routinely established that, “summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and no genuine issue of material fact remains for trial;" properly supported factual allegations of the party opposing summary judgment must be accepted as true.” Perez v. Las Vegas Med. Ctr., 107 Nev. 1, 805 P.2d 589 (1991). ARGUMENT Daily Mirror was well within its rights to terminate Ms. Cohen’s employment at any time and for any reason…

Independent Legal Judgment is an important concept for the regulations of both attorneys and paralegals. Independent legal judgment is defined as "the comparison and the evaluation of possible courses of conduct, and acting or making a decision after the various possibilities have been considered." Schaefer-Larose v. Eli Lilly & Co., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97220 (S.D. Ind. Sept. 29, 2009). While a lawyer may delegate tasks and responsibilities to a paralegal, the lawyer has a professional…

Future Event Number Eight: The Seven Seal Judgments Up to now, it has been the enemies of God wrecking havoc on the earth, but things are about to change dramatically. God has physically intervened, and will carry the battle to the wicked by a series of judgments. The first segment of judgments is called the seven seal judgments, which are, like all the judgments, aimed at the wicked with two objectives in mind. First, to let the wicked reap what they have sown, thus fulfilling God’s justice,…

situations (Forgays et al, 1997; Aslan, 2016). This study uses the Spielberger State Trait Anger Scale (STAXI) and draws on the Choe et al. (2011) study which found those with a higher TA score would make utilitarian judgments more often. They reasoned that higher TA scores resulted in these judgments due to being more quickly roused to act to prevent harm to others or more desirous of removing obstacles preventing them achieving a goal (Choe et al., 2011). However these studies lack clarity in…

There are approximately 2.01 billion Christians in the world, all professing to carry the name Christian, follower of Jesus. But how many out of that great number sincerely desire to know Him better every day, think of Him as their very Best Friend, and surrender their lives to Him out of a loving and trusting ongoing, personal relationship with Him? He was a young guy, but had been married a couple years to this “Christian” girl. They both attended church every week, but neither had a personal…

One of the aims of Feminist Judgments Project is to apply the theory into practice and to show that a case could be decided differently through feminist lens. There are many types of feminisms which include liberal feminism, radical feminism and cultural/ difference feminism, to name a few. Freeman has identified the common characteristics of these different types of feminisms, which include ‘a belief that society, and legal order, is patriarchal’ and that ‘it seeks to analyse the contribution…