Judge

Angela M. Blythe, lawyer, 51, Oakland, Maryland, was sentenced by a government jury of plotting to confer bank extortion, bank misrepresentation and two checks of putting forth a false expression to a bank. Blythe was a lawyer authorized to practice in Maryland and West Virginia, with an office in Oakland, Maryland. She was a settlement lawyer in land exchanges. As indicated by proof displayed at the nine day trial, from 2000 to 2006, Blythe arranged deeds, home loans and notes utilizing false…

The most interesting part about this job is the verdict of the case. I say this because you never now what the judge may decide , all you can do is ready the case carefully and make sure your client isn't holding anything from you. I enjoyed the experience of watching a Civil case, however I didn’t enjoy how much paper work Mrs. Julie had to complete. She became…

It is human nature for individuals to desire a response from others when confronted with an adverse situation, humans want to know if someone did something or if they did not (Greenfield, 2013). This requires a response of admitting to the situation or denying it. In the courtroom the jurors are the ones seeking this response, consequently, the jurors are human. The inferences they may draw from the defendant’s refusal to testify could lead them to believe right away they are guilty of something…

and petition, protection against self-incrimination, cruel and unusual punishments, and establishes the idea of innocent until proven guilty. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, a play involving the Salem witchcraft trials of 1692, the court led by Judge Danforth is determining the sentencing of accused witches in their town. The court fails at carrying out justice in these cases because the judge's childishness…

system. The term is life for the justices that get appointed. This is all very relevant and everyone should know the process considering the next presidential election decides the person that will be appointing probably around four new supreme court judges, making the stakes even higher. (Morris, AlterNet.) If I had any control over the judicial branch my first decision would be to give set terms for supreme court justices. I don’t understand why every other position of power has set terms…

Criminal defense attorneys are skilled professionals who have experience defending their clients against serious felony or misdemeanor criminal charges. The best criminal defense professionals have completed years of education in the law and criminal defense fields and they have hundreds of hours of real-world courtroom experience facing aggressive prosecutors. When faced with a criminal complaint, the defendant must know how to find the best defense team available in order to increase their…

A court house is where a lot legal issues are resolved or deferred to another court or a higher authority. However, the individuals who make up the court range from a clerk all way to a judge. These individuals all have different jobs in which make the court run smoothly. With the court system everything needs to be organized and have a systematic approach. In this paper I will be discussing an individual who works with the Middlesex County Superior Court in the Civil Law Division, her title is…

Lawyer, a profession that practices or studies law, is a career I wish to pursue because I could help innocent people, have an intellectual challenge, and have flexibility. I have been interested in this career for along time, but I just thought I could actually become a lawyer. The reason why I like this career is the challenge of becoming a lawyer. For instant every state has their own set of laws a lawyer has to follow, or the lawyer could get into a lot of trouble. The only challenge I think…

In his article, Dutelle (2008) details the subjective errors of omissions, false misrepresentation among other mistakes that are made knowingly or inadvertently by forensic investigators. The investigative processes involved in solving a criminal act possessing the presence of evidence through application of forensic science, he opines, can lead to wrong conclusion that has a ripple effect of wrong justice being meted out by the legal system on innocent individuals that relies on such. His…

presence of trial by jury. Therefore, it could be argued that if there was a jury within family courts, that even if reporting restrictions remained in place, that this would increase the justice that can be said to be done. Within family courts, judges’ control the entire process and decide everything which was addressed by Fred Silberberg. He also stated; “this is an awful lot of decision making to vest in the hands of one person”. So, it is questionable whether providing this much power in…