International criminal law

In the United States, the use of mandatory minimums became commonplace with support from both sides of the political spectrum. With public support for tough laws, these sentencing minimums were enacted across the country due to increasing crime rates. However, in certain states, lawmakers and taxpayers are beginning to see that these laws cost more than they help. In Tallahassee, Florida, a twenty-five-year drug sentence for selling thirty-five pills for $300 will cost taxpayers an average of…

This article published by CTV News, speaks of an incident that occurred in Hamilton, Ontario on October 5, 2017. It is believed that Nathan Wehrle not only kidnapped a girl, but caused a police chase by his refusal to cooperate. The vehicle driven, was stolen from a friend of his sister, and the chase resulted in a head-on collision with a transport truck, killing the teen couple instantly. Wehrle’s sister is not shocked by her brother’s thievery, but is by his “’killing and abducting people.”’…

Economic status this day in time is everything if you don’t have money, then people will judge you for it. In many cases in the department of criminal justice people are let go because their family’s wealth or their wealth and it’s not a good thing because rapists and killers are let free with a clean slate because they have money. Innocent poor people are sent to jail because there at the wrong place at the wrong time, because they have no money they cannot get a good lawyer and they have to…

Quennie Volupides is guilty of murdering her husband Arthur. First off, she had both a motive and opportunity to commit the crime. Second, all the hard evidence points to her guilt. Finally, we believe the murder weapon was found at the scene and is tied to Queenie. I arrived at the scene around 2 o’clock in the morning after what I thought was my last shift for the night. The first piece of evidence I discovered about the case was about Arthur’s wife. Queenie mentioned she went to the country…

At one time, courts applied the same test for determining whether a federal constitutional error was harmless in direct appeals and habeas corpus proceedings. Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967) was the standard for harmless error review in both direct appeals and habeas corpus proceedings. Currently, the applicable harmlessness standard depends on the procedural posture of the case. Chapman remains the standard for direct appeals, but the standard in a collateral proceeding differs from a…

agree it could have been a better idea to run instead of turn themselves in. Evidence Paragraph-2 Johnny, and Pony-boy should have went to the police, that way it would not be considered murder, but self-defence. The Law Firm of Oklahoma…

striking Judy in the face and taking her pants off should be enough evidence to get a felony assault charge or even a rape charge. Shortly after Mike physically removed Judy from his vehicle, she was found deceased due to hypothermia. In the court of law the prosecution only has to prove two elements to get the felony murder charge. The first…

“Hawaii Five-0” season 6’s next episode will see Danny’s family become the subject of another FBI investigation as a result of his brother’s actions in the past. In the previous episode of “Hawaii Five-0” season 6, the team members exchanged their cringe-worthy Valentine’s Day experiences. Aside from that, they investigated a murder case tied with infidelity, the Latin Post recalls. The upcoming episode titled “Ke Koa Lokomaika’l” (The Good Soldier) will show the FBI investigating the Williams…

Starting with the story of Mercedes Renee Haefer, who was arrested with the attacks against online payment service PayPal, the vendetta against Scientology, the defense of WikiLeaks, and support of the actions in Tunisia and Egypt during the Arab Spring (Watercutter). All launching We Are Legion into the headlines while uncovering the truth behind the attacks, the people behind the group, and the actions the government has taken to shut down Anonymous. We Are Legion is an ‘okay’ film for the…

Should Tom and Huck tell the sheriff about the murder of Dr.Robinson that they witnessed? Tom and Huck should tell the sheriff because if they don’t they could get in trouble. They would have a murder in town. Some people think that they if they tell than the indian and his tribe will come back to kill Tom and Huck. They think that if they don’t tell than when someone figures out later they can get in even bigger trouble later on. Tom and Huck can be thrown in jail just like the murder if you…