International Criminal Court

Dear judge. This is my Declaration regarding our case For Grandparent visitation. I Am the father of the 3 children And the son of the petitioner Victoria Montano-Burke. I’m writing This letter for the concern of our children’s health and wellbeing. Our children have been full of stress and also poor eating habits. Are youngest child Logan Arnold has been chewing his fingers and Bitting his nails ever since this visitation has started. Our middle child Mason Arnold has been eating poorly and his…

The New York Conspiracy Trials was a supposed plot by the poor white people and the enslaved African Americans to revolt, burn down New York City and kill the rich white citizens of New York. After a string of fires that burned down several buildings in New York slaves were identified as the only possible suspects, which are depicted in “Reading and Writing Terror: The New York Conspiracy Trials of 1741” written by Andy Doolen and in “The New York Conspiracy, Or A History of the Negro Plot”…

As I am reading the book, I will be predicting the case verdict. I believe that the case will be decided that Tom Robinson is innocent and that Mr. Ewell was bluffing. One major reason I believe the case will be decided in favor of the defendants because there was no evidence to support the rape that was accused by Tom Robinson. First off, he is a crippled human being because “his left arm was fully twelve inches shorter than his right arm “(Lee 248). He is also right-handed so it would be…

Modification Of Existing Custody Order before the honorable Judge, in the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County, Pennsylvania. Complete the petition with ink and attach all 7 forms of the packet duly filling them with reference to the plaintiff and defendant in spite of who is filing the petition. Submit copy of every document with the Prothonotary. Maintain dress code as required, turn off the cell phone when in the court. You must be over 18 years of age for acquiring eligibility to file a…

then charged with burglary. Mempa’s probation was revoked, due to the burglary charge, and during the revocation process, Mempa had no counsel to represent him, was not offered the option of having counsel to represent him, nor asked of his previous court-appointed counsel. He plead guilty to the burglary charges and was sentenced to 10 years maximum, in compliance to Washington State Law ("Mempa v. Rhay 389 U.S. 128 (1967)", 2017). Within six years, Mempa sought a writ of Habeas Corpus because…

the Supreme Court held that the woman is subject to the proclivities of the husband’s behavior. Therefore, the court wrote, “every man must govern his household, and if by reason of an unruly temper, or an unbridled tongue, the wife persistently treats her husband with disrespect, and he submits to it, he not only loses all sense of self-respect, but loses the respect of the other members of his family, without which he cannot expect to govern them” (Joyner v. Joyner, 1862). The court reasoned…

representation. For example, the transcript of the Rule 11 hearing shows that the Court never asked whether the brothers understood effective versus ineffective assistance of counsel; whether they understood reasonable diligence in legal representation; whether they understood the actual work expected of attorneys in CCE and money laundering cases and against…

Defendant seeks summary judgment from this Court, despite its claim to the contrary. Under the Maryland rules, when a defendant files a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, and matters outside the pleadings are presented to and considered by the court, “the motion shall be treated as one for summary judgment and disposed of as provided in Rule 2-501.” MD. RULE 2-322(c) (emphasis added). The reason for this rule is that with a motion to dismiss the court considers only the allegations…

On Friday, April 6, I attended the District of Columbia Superior Court in order to witness the criminal justice system at hand rather than in the classroom or by reading a textbook. I witnessed cases that involved prostitution and cases that involved knives. Moreover, I noticed that the judges were either a man or woman, sitting front and center of the courtroom as they were clothed with an official black robe. I was greeted at the courthouse by security and walked through a metal detector,…

six and twelve individuals are chosen from a jury pool. Then the selection process begins. The first step is a random selection from a jury pool. The second step is the jury selection, known as voir dire. Voire Dire is a jury procedure, which the court and the attorneys narrow the pool of jurors. This process is done by the judge randomly selecting people in the juror pool to be excused and/or the attorneys questioning potential jurors to screen out individuals the attorneys think might be…