Hypothetical imperative

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant discusses laws of nature and freedom and acting with reason versus impulse, with the implication of free will. This explication will discuss the qualifications of reason and being rational, acting in conformity of the law or with the representation of the law, and giving oneself a law with free will. These premises set by Kant lead him to conclude that only rational beings have the ability to act “in accordance with the representation of…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s writing “The Good Will” he claims that actions that are performed in conformity with duty are not truly moral, and they are not done just for the sake of duty alone. It is actually quite difficult to think of an action that is done purely for the duty itself. Kant states that most actions are done simply out of interest or an inclination to do something in order to reach another motive, rather than doing a task for the sake of duty. If that is true, it is virtually impossible…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Categorical Imperative

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    based on categorical imperative. Main Reason 2 The focus on intentions to see if an action is moral or not. Main Raison 3 Rejection of the consequentialist theories including common good and ethical egoism. Definition of major term(s) According to Kant, ‘using a person as an end in itself’ implies that the fact of existing give us value. This also highlights the idea that we should not use people for our own benefits,…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exam 4 Elijah Martinez Dr. Bednar 1. Kant’s premises on his ethical theory on his own categorical imperative. Kant argues that one must act as though their actions could form the universal law; treat others kindly as an end in itself, not as a means. Furthermore, Kant claims that the only thing that can truly be good is a good will. This good will is necessary for one to deserve happiness, another claim from Kant. Additionally, Kant sees that we are all equals, and as such, moral rules that…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To distinguish a difference between Kant and Nietzsche, Kant was the first one, between the two of them to explain the theory of morals. Some values as he defines them have a built in value which have developed by themselves, and they follow those values as they lead to this statement: “Duty carries with itself absolute necessity”. This claim explains Kant’s way of explaining moral theory. Which is where Nietzsche firstly disagrees with Kant, he refused to accept the same values as a given fact…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    children. Therefore, you should seek psychiatric help. While this seems perfectly valid, suppose we replace the first premise with a hypothetical imperative: If you want to torture children, you should volunteer as a babysitter. You want to torture children. Therefore, you should volunteer as a babysitter. Thus, when we affirm the first premise as a hypothetical imperative, we mean it in a sense that does not validate such an…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    discusses the idea of an imperative as it relates to moral decision making, specifically how a person will decide the right course of action in any given situation. Kant defines imperative as a demand or command of reason action. When we have a goal in mind, the imperative is the reasonable course of action that we feel we must take. Kant then distinguishes between two types of imperatives. First, he discusses hypothetical imperatives. A hypothetical imperative is one an imperative where you…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the moral principle being the categorical imperative. Not only that, but categorical imperatives are moral requirements. On the other hand, hypothetical imperatives are not moral requirements. The categorical imperative is also known as the Supreme Principle of Morality and is formulated in three different ways. I will discuss the hypothetical imperative, and only two out of the three formulations of the categorical imperative. The hypothetical imperative is basically if I want something then I…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    categorical imperative” (Johnson & Cureton, 2018). Simply, categorical imperatives are actions that people choose to do or not do based solely on their morals. Whereas, “Hypothetical imperatives tell you what to do in order to achieve a particular goal” (Holt, 2009). For example, when people use an if/then scenario to arrive at a specific conclusion in order to accomplish a desired effect. In addition, Jeremy Schwartz published that “Recently, the idea that every hypothetical imperative must…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and the hypothetical and categorical imperative are defined by Kant; he expands on these fundamental concepts and truly provides a groundwork for a branch of ethics philosophy. “Nothing in the world—or out of it!—can…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50