High Court of Justice

legal definition found online at thefreedictionary.com, the Supreme Court “decides the most important issues of constitutional and statutory law and is intended to provide legal clarity and consistency for the lower appellate and trial courts”. So what happens when the political ideological values of most powerful court in the country becomes askew? Well, that is exactly what happened with the unexpected death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and the effects to the Supreme Court’s…

thou, Drug treatment court. Although it may sound like a good thing to keep non violent criminals out of prison the fact of the matter is, Are Drug treatment courts more…

The 2016 Campaign and the Supreme Court Niki Seemann GOVT 2301 Federal Government Professor: Michael Enders The 2016 Campaign and the Supreme Court The 2016 Presidential Election has consisted of a high contrast between the Democratic and Republican parties. The Trump campaign highly appeals to the voters who are apprehensive of the country’s evolution over recent years (Decker, 2016). The Clinton campaign appeals to a vast array of minorities (Decker, 2016). In…

On January 23, 2002 a senior at Juneau-Douglas High School, that goes by the name Joseph Frederick, was excused from his classes, with the other students, to watch the Olympic Torch pass by in his town of Juneau, Alaska. Him and his friends went across the street and waited for the TV cameras to start rolling to unravel a banner that they made that said “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”. The principal, Deborah Morse, soon saw the banner and ran across the street to intercept their act. Principle Morse says he…

When a youth commits a crime one worries about how they will be processed within the justice system. The juvenile justice system originally was based on punishing any juvenile over the age of seven in the same manner as they punished adults. These concepts began to change as society started to assess, psychologically, the mental capacity of a child. Do they really understand the consequences of their action? As noted on the website Attorney Directory – LawyerShop (2015), this was the…

Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr. is currently a Supreme Court justice and considered to have a rather conservative take on things. He is well known to lean towards making decisions that align with the ideals of a libertarian. On April 1, 1950, Samuel A. Alito Jr. was born in Trenton, New Jersey. He was raised in Hamilton, New Jersey. His father, Samuel A. Alito, emigrated from Italy and both of his parents were school teachers. Alito’s strong views on immigration originate from his father. Even through…

roads at top speeds. This leads to numerous accidents with vehicles on the road. Often, the accidents are catastrophic and lead to serious life altering injuries or even death. Another issue arises because the drivers are operating the vehicle for a high powered company with several lawyers that are versed on truck injury. Furthermore, the truck driver is also an out of state driver. This leads to enormous complications and issues that must be addressed by someone that is knowledgeable on truck…

trial without counsel. Dietrich had applied to the Legal Aid Commission of Victoria, who rejected his claim on the grounds that he was not willing to plead guilty to the charges. He felt this went against his rights and appealed his case to the High Court of Australia. 3 What role did the individual or group play in taking…

beginning, the juvenile justice system has advanced from witnessing children being sentenced in adult courts to a system that struggles to protect the welfare of juvenile delinquents, but to also be firm on the acts of crime to protect the public from harm. With the development of times reforms made to the juvenile justice system changed from the initial goal of changing the system to a less severe one to a system that has a unique resemblance to the adult criminal justice system. The sources…

So the Court laid down a criterion for the determination of “appropriate cases”, ie., the infringement must be patent, incontrovertible, gross and shocks the conscience of the court. It is being attempted here to make a fact analysis of some cases, where compensation was awarded under article 32, to expose and analyze this trend- the trend in choosing “appropriate cases”. As already mentioned, in Rudul Sah case, violation was of right to life and personal liberty and the fact was already stated.…