Greenwich Mean Time

my eye. The first being the one labeled “Then and Now” which shows the difference in percentages from 2004 to 2013 in whether people described themselves as optimists or pessimists. The percent of Optimist decreased from 70% to 50%, which can only mean that more people negatively view the aspects of things which questionably brings up the question to why more people think this way? Sadness is a main part of thinking negatively which is also related to one’s surroundings and environment. This…

The impact of under watering plants causes it to dry out, wilt, and if not watered in time, ultimately die. Under watering a seed will cause the coating around the seed to not dissolve, and be unable to germinate (Frost). Over watering plants have similar concenquences. The plant will wilt, yellow, but it could also have an edema when overwatering…

and 6.0 and used to monitor such important factor. The selected conditions in such study were 0.5-6.0 min as the dipping time, 15 dipping cycles, the…

temperature. During the increase of the annealing temperature , the strengthening is more obvious. Annealing at 850 °C with low coiling temperature at 500 °C causes an increase of yield strength up to 600 MPa. Those values along with low elongation would mean the exclusion from deep-drawing steel qualities and, on the contrary, they would be regarded as high strength steel. This assertion is supported by the values of elongation at the level of 10%. Also a change in size of grain in the range of…

The Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 Revised (CSAI-2R), is one of the most frequently used instruments in the evaluation of situational anxiety in sports competition. Objectives: The objective of this study was to validate the Tunisian version based on the French version of the Competitive State Anxiety Inventory-2 Revised (CSAI-2R), including the direction and the frequency scales. Method: 418 athletes ranging in age from 14 to 34 years in different individual and team competitions,…

Aggressiveness scores? We have Verbal Aggressiveness scores for 59 students. ¥ What is the mean for the entire sample? The mean for the entire sample is 44.0169. ¥ How do you interpret the mean score? When we interpret the mean score, we should look at the minimum and the maximum scores, so we can see the mean are close to each one. In verbal aggressiveness, the minimum is 26 and the maximum is 65, which indicates that the mean around the middle of these scores. ¥ What are the other measures…

lifestyle factors and willingness to engage in self-care scores there are a total of 14 participants. The levels of central tendency consist of the mean of 5.5 which is the average score, the median of 5.5 which is the exact middle number and the mode of 7 which is the most frequent occurring score (Salkind, 2013). There was an average deviation from the sample mean of 2.35, therefore it can be said that 95% of cases would fall between -2 standard deviation (SD) and +2SD (Loiselle et al., 2011).…

budgets but this does not always mean that they are more successful in completing their goals. The larger a budget the more patrol officers the department can put on the road. Each officer on the road must be paid their salary, trained properly, provided a vehicle capable of accomplishing their tasks, and provided the tools and equipment needed for their safety. Each vehicle on the road must be purchases, maintained, fueled, and replaced when worn out. Response time is an important…

scores were collected, but these scores cannot be compared to the general population. The GFTA-2 does not reach a normal distribution for most ages. For the GFTA-2 the standard score average is 100 with a standard deviation of 15. The average score means that any scores greater than 100 are above average and any scores less than 100 are below average. For the test-age equivalent score, it should be observed that the test-age equivalent scores do not go above the ages…

Measuring of Execution after training: Table No. 1: Details of respondents’ analysis towards measuring of execution after training. Measuring of Execution after training Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid 50% 161 33.3 33.3 33.3 25% 322 66.7 66.7 100.0 Total 483 100.0 100.0 Source: Field Survey INTERPRETATION: The above table no. 1 attempts to conclude that, 33.3% of the respondents opined with regard to measuring of evaluation after training program that 50% of the…