Fourth dimension

Buie where he was subsequently found hiding in the basement. The officers on scene searched the basement following the arrest of Buie where they found in plain view the red running suit. Buie attempted to have the evidence suppressed, citing that his Fourth Amendment rights had been violated by the officers conducting the search. The trial court dismissed the claim made by Buie, finding that the officers acted within reasonable measures to protect themselves from an attack.…

these motions and concluded that the search warrant was not valid due to the lack of probable cause for the warrant. They however recognized that Officer Rombach had acted in good faith, the court then rejected the Government's suggestion that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule should not apply where evidence is seized in reasonable, good faith reliance on a search warrant. Then the case was taken to the Court of Appeals which also agreed that the officer did in fact act in good faith and…

the officer did feel a “lump” in the respondent’s jacket. The officer probed further and discovered the lump was a cellophane bag containing cocaine. The respondent moved to have the cocaine evidence be suppressed because the officer violated his Fourth Amendment rights to a lawful search and seizure. Nonetheless, the trial court rejected that request based the reasonable cause the officers had to search him. Falling on Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) the state felt that due to Mr.…

The law also breached the Fourth Amendment, which should protect people from being search and seizure. It raised controversial issues, such as violating the Constitution and agents could monitor a terrorist even if they haven’t found evidence he belongs to a foreign terrorist organization…

cause can each play a role in making an automobile stop, however the terms are used interchangeably. The term, probable cause” is used to “support” a traffic stop, whereas the term “reasonable suspicion” is used as a standard that complies with the Fourth Amendment; the right against “unreasonable” searches and seizures. So if officers are within the rights, he may then proceed to stop a vehicle; that is if he has “reasonable suspicion” to believe that a traffic violation or crime has occurred.…

To expound on the process of the Fourth Amendment, we must recognize and interpret its meaning. The Fourth Amendment is the protection of our citizen privacy against certain governmental interferences (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p. 105). The procedural rights of The Fourth Amendment are the search and seizure of citizens property and/or person in violation of the criminal law, with a meaningful interference by the government. There has to be probable cause. A search and seizure have to be within reason…

The legal issue of whether Victor’s mental disability, medication, and Attention Deficient Disorder (ADD) was crucial information as to why, he committed the crime. In the case of United States v. Kozminski (1988) two men with mental disbalitlies where held to work for low or no wages and threatened and physiologically coerced to stay on the farm to work. The courts agreed that the men were coerced due to their mental incapacity. The act of coercion kept the men captive at the farm. In…

That principle however is doing quite well, as far as following it. The fourth is where it gets a little bit tangled. The fourth principle states, that when the government does not protect the rights of the people, the people have the right to change or remove the governement, and I have shown you an example of how the government had not protected the…

the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, or interpreted through the years by courts and lawmakers.” It includes freedome of speech or the rights to be secure agaisnt unreasonable searches and seizures, which is also written in the Fourth Amendment, and more. The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,…

Was the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments violated? Holding: The Trial Court held that the officer did have probable cause to search the vehicle and arrest the three men. The Supreme Court held that the officer did have probable cause to believe that Pringle had committed the crime of possession of a controlled substance. The Supreme Courts holding that the officer had probable cause to arrest Pringle also proves that the officer did not violate the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments…