Fourth Crusade

by the previous owner, but she was arrested and found guilty for possession or pornographic material. Mapp was unable to win over the Ohio Supreme Court, so she took her case to the US Supreme Court where they decided this was a violation of the fourth amendment. Former attorney general and Associate Justice then stated, “We hold that all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution…

" The United States’ government in any branch should have very minimal access to people’s private doings on the internet. American’s have a right to privacy and this can be seen throughout the Constitution. The Fourth Amendment explains that people are protected from unreasonable search and seizure. This extends to the internet. People’s search history is their own business and the federal government doesn’t have the authority to violate American’s right. The only time that the…

Facts: Officers came to the home of Miss Mapp looking for a bombing suspect; however, upon the initial visit Miss Mapp under the advise of her lawyer, told officers to return with a warrant. Officers returned with a piece of paper—claimed to be a warrant—and forced their way into the house. When Mapp’s lawyer showed up to the residence, the lawyer was denied the right to see his/her client and when Mapp demanded to see the warrant, the officers showed her a paper which she snatched and placed…

Summary of the case: On March 23, 2014 at 3:00am, a black male wearing a leather jacket was spotted pulling car doors in a parking lot. When police arrived they pulled over Mr. Price on the sidewalk ( a black male wearing a leather jacket) and asked if they could search him. He agreed, but proceeded to grab his backpack and run. The backpack was found 50 yards later with a gun and some papers belonging to Mr. Price. He was convicted of many criminal charges and sentenced to 18 months in prison.…

"The Fourth Amendment states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” The NSA hacking, wire-tapping and spying on civilians goes directly against the Constitution. It puts them at risk of unreasonable…

The fourth amendment protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizure of their possessions and property. The Weeks v. United States case law was established in 1914, which consisted of police entering Fremont Weeks home and illegally seizing evidence of Weeks transporting lottery tickets through the mail. This case is what brought forth the exclusionary rule, which makes any evidence obtained during an illegal search and seizure possibly inadmissible in court. To uphold the fourth…

procedural rights mainly fall under the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, better known as the Bill of Rights. The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments apply to a person when it comes to the criminal justice system. These amendments go hand in hand in protecting a person who finds themselves involved in a legal fight. The Fourth Amendment protects an individual from illegal searches and seizures. A search is defined as “explorations or inspections, by law…

WAS THE ARREST OF SASSY LAWFUL? I WAS THERE IMPLIED LICENCE? In Halliday v Nevill, as the High Court held, the police officers have implied licence to go upon the path leading to the entrance of private dwellings for legitimate purposes . Officers Andrew and Annabel went upon the drive way and stopped by the front door with purpose of questioning Sassy. Sassy is a sister of Cassy and is likely a lawful visitor at the party hosted by Cassie. They arrested Sassy on the driveway in the end.…

obtained for a search warrant obtained through an illegal search? If the search is found to be illegal, should all the evidence gathered be suppressed? Cases: The Fourth Amendment details legal searches and seizures and the right to ban illegally obtained evidence in court. There are three questions that are addressed when dealing with Fourth Amendment searches. Was the law enforcement act a search, if it was a search was it reasonable, and if it was found unreasonable, is the evidence banned…

Unit 10 DB 1 Lawyer and Lawyer v. City of Council Bluffs, Iowa The case of Timothy LAWYER and Michael Lawyer, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF COUNCIL BLUFFS, IOWA was very interesting. Once this learner reviewed the video she understood the law, but also understood the Lawyers fear as well. This case went from bad to worst in the worst way. Lawyer and Lawyer Lawyer and Lawyer, two brothers about 17 and age 23 were pulled over for a traffic stop in regards to speeding on the 26th of March, 1999, at…