First Lady of the United States

is protected by the constitution. Direct incitement remains the best test to use in cases like this because it expresses a very liberalistic interpretation of the 1st amendment. The first step to interpreting why this test is appropriate for this case is through John Stuart Mill’s liberal interpretation of the first amendment. In Mills literature “On Liberty of thought and discussion” he expressed that we shouldn’t have to conform to the majorities opinion. He…

On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme…

actual laws that determine whether or not material should be censored. Though this can be a sensitive subject, I wish to proceed from the viewpoint of whether the artist of the song deserved to have this song pulled off radio stations across the United States. On December 14, 2012 a shooter opened fire on an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut that sparked emotion all across the country which lead to the ban of multiple songs that referenced death of young people and shootings. I’ve chosen…

treatment of all people under the law (Legal Information Institute). Those advocating religious freedom back their claims with the First Amendment, which ensures that the government does not interfere with the free exercise of religion, or create an official religion (Sidlow and Henschen 77). Compromise is necessary to uphold…

inevitable immigration, the United States passed laws that were specifically designed to reduce immigration numbers from foreign countries. The Immigration Quota Act of 1921 was one of the first passed to reduce immigration and it was probably the most effective. This system allowed only 150,000 immigrants a year to enter the country. Congress also developed the quota system. Each National quota was based on the supposed origins of the entire white population of the United States, not merely on…

When we begin this story, Carver uses the inner dialogue of “Bub,” the narrator, to allow the reader some insight into Bub’s character and his vast ignorance of the world outside of his home. Preceding a visit from his wife’s blind friend, Robert, the narrator makes many brash comments that give a sense of his lack of acquaintance with visually disabled people. Bub admits, “And his being blind bothered me. My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never…

Though, as we know, re-launching a product is more difficult than launching it for the first time, because it is true that some people liked it but some others don't know anything about it and might have a bad idea about it because it was not a success in the first time, that's why the company has to double its efforts to change the bad image of the brand in some people's minds, as well as to introduce it to new customers and…

Eleven years after America declared its independence from England the Constitution was adopted and signed into this great nation. This was not event our Founding Fathers took lightly as it took them 116 days to produce the final document that would not even be ratified for almost another year. Of all the Founding Fathers, it was Thomas Jefferson who insisted that a bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against any government. This man who was helped shape the freedoms that we take…

Fortas composed for the larger part. He initially underscored that understudies have First Amendment rights. “It can scarcely be contended that either understudies…

“Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech” is the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Does this amendment state that I can say anything, without restriction, and not have consequences from the government? The language the first amendment uses indicates that government cannot restrain any speech; but, there is speech that is constitutionally protected and there is speech that is not constitutionally protected. I believe the wording of the amendment is broad and we do have…