Federal Trade Commission

Merriam Webster defines Net Neutrality as a requirement for all Internet Service Providers(ISPs) to treat all Internet data the same regardless of its source, type, or destination. Some people argue against net neutrality because they feel that the government should not be allowed to regulate the Internet. Net Neutrality is an important part of our society, it allows for an open Internet which is free from discrimination, monopolies, and prevents it from becoming stagnant. ISPs are like the…

In the article “Point/Counterpoint Network Neutrality Nuances”, Barbara van Schewick expresses the importance of net neutrality in ISPs. Van Schewick explains in the article, her opinion that the ability to access information should not be controlled by ISPs. To support her thesis, van Schewick presents examples of ISPs restricting the availability of services, and the consequences of these restrictions. She strongly emphasises the importance of net neutrality throughout the article, which helps…

Discussions: Several discussions, debates were going on supporting and opposing net neutrality. There are advantages and disadvantages regarding this. Several regulations are also brought w.r.t protect net neutrality, but bigger corporations are still trying to oppose this free and open access of internet. Advantages and disadvantages are discussed below: Advantages: 1) No Limitations: There are no limitations on internet service usage other than the limitations proposed by the government.…

As a consumer who spends quite a few hours a day using the Internet, be it for business or pleasure, I care about what is going on online. Net neutrality is something that has recently sparked some interest here in America when the Federal Communications Commission voted on net neutrality regulations. The big question is what exactly does this vote mean and will it really influence the regular consumer as much as the twitter trends…

legislation, so they challenged the FCC in court. As a result, the US Court of Appeals scrapped the rules against blocking and discrimination, leaving transparency as the only required guideline (Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission). Considering the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has yet to finish developing a system of net neutrality in the United States, the fate of the Internet is…

After the FCC’s decision to repeal net neutrality in 2017, many people began to take notice of these laws, which had previously been ignored for a good 2 years. Net neutrality was brought about in 2015, after many years of failed attempts trying to set these rules in place. Net neutrality laws, according to the “International Business Times,” were able to prevent ISPs from “slowing or throttling a user’s connection,” making sure users get the connection speeds they paid for without any regard…

Net Neutrality is a concept that defines access to the internet and all the information offered on the web as a human right without any discrimination. Meaning that internet service providers (ISPs) cannot and should not restrict access to any online content or show any favoritism to any online source above others. The debate over net neutrality has a long-standing history. To begin we must understand classifications of communication services un the Communications Act of 1934. Title I of the…

When it is certain to confine parliamentary decisions for the sake of the insufficiency of the government’s ruling, it’s reasonable to state these disagreements. Thus, the nation should prevent the Federal Communications Commission, from withdrawing Net Neutrality. Based on the policy, where everyone is equal and certain rights are not abridged nor ignored. The FCC has abused their proposition and neglected our opinions. As a consequence, they are reshaping Americans’ online experience. This…

Regulation needs to occur in regards to innovative technology but also trade technology specifically. Trade has moved on with the advancement of technology to make trade easier. To stay in the past with our current policies would be nonsensical. If companies and their methods are advancing, the rules of the game must also advance with them. The policies and regulations from the CFTC “…have stayed pretty much the same. Most of the CFTC’s rules were written for 20th century analog markets”…

Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, 2016, saw the Washington D. C. Court of Appeals uphold what was appeared to be a weak argument from the FCC for classification as a common carrier subject to Title II of the Communications Act. The continued…