Family court

The Witness Security Reform Act, 1984 provides for relocation and other protection of a witness or a potential witness (and the family members or people closely associated, in some cases).The United States has one of the most well developed Witness Protection Programmes. Effective Witness Protection schemes are there in Canada and South Africa also. In European countries such as…

is difficult to say which system is the most effective as they all have their own strengths and weaknesses. Throughout this essay, I will be identifying the keys arguments in Nils Christie’s article “Conflicts as Property,” then comparing it to the court system in Canada. Christie’s article focuses on the idea of how legal professionals are taking other people’s conflicts and altering it to make it fit with our legal system. With this being said, I agree with the points made in Christie’s…

Stated in the book CJ in the USA: An Introduction to Criminal Justice “The courts are just one component of the overall criminal justice system. The function of the courts is to judge and make proper disposition of crimes, it is in this venue that the guilt or innocence of a defendant is determined”(Byrum,2014). Key players important to the court system are prosecution, defense, judge, and the jury. To start off the prosecutor works with police by reviewing evidence, and preparing a search…

floor to the plaintiff attorney Richard Whitley introduced himself and his client which was named Michelle Moore. The defendant name was Joshua Muniz. He stated that the case was a motor vehicle accident and had already been trialed at a criminal court, which Defendant Muniz had plead guilty and was on probation and has severed community service for committing the crime. Moore was now suing for Punitive damages and mental anguish for damages that were occurred during the accident. Whitley then…

The Highest Court and Final Court of Appeal in Canadian justice system build up the Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court offers permission to over 40 litigants of appeal decisions annually that are rendered by the federal, provincial, and territorial appellate courts. The court gives the ultimate expression of the decision and application of the Canadian law. Besides, the lower courts abide by these decisions. The Supreme Court was created by an act of parliament in 1875. There are cases,…

A significant number of offenders have been convicted of drug related offenses, many of which have entered the United States’ court system, jails, and prisons. Of these offenders many are suffering from drug related addictions (Journal of Experimental Criminology). Drug use and crime have continuously been of increasing concern. Drug abuse is becoming much more prevalent, as drugs are becoming more readily accessible. Research shows that incarceration of offenders charged with drug-related…

Case: Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart 427 U.S. 539 Decision: 9-0, delivered by Chief Justice Burger Facts: Erwin Charles Simants was a suspect of sexual assault and the murdering six members of the Kellie family in their home in Sutherland, Nebraska. Simants had confessed to law enforcement officers and had disclosed information to other private parties. This murder attracted attention to the town from local and nation news broadcasters. Simants’ attorney and the county attorney met before…

glimmering was stopped before the tractor. Brower collided with the tractor trailer and was murdered. The decedent's family recorded a &1983 activity asserting that the Brower’s Fourth Amendment rights to be free from outlandish seizure were abused by the officers who were acting under the shade of law. Contention of the parties: The candidate argues, does the police utilization of an…

Atticus seemed to back her into a corner with his questioning, and out of desperation, she busted out exclaiming her next statement will be the last. Mayella reeled back, saying he took advantage of her, and then addressed the whole audience of the court stating they would be cowards if they didn’t convict him. The outburst is clearly a last resort method from emotional distress, all leading to the assumption of false testimony. In clear contrast, Tom is called upon in his defense and described…

of a fiduciary relationship. The Court of Appeals in Hunter favorably cited the Terry case as an instructive example regarding the sufficiency of allegations: Terry [v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 273 S.E.2d 674 (1981)] is instructive on the sufficiency of allegations. Terry involved a defendant who took advantage of his dying brother by inducing him to sell his portion of a business at an inadequate price. The complaint was sufficient because it described the family relationship, the business…