Expert witness

whether or not the improvement of the evaluation from the juror happens when there is the support from the expert (p. 400). The argument explains when the juror needs clarification and further understanding on the inaccurate eyewitness, their mind has formed the idea of the witness is already unreliable, which fades out their incredulity. Moreover, there is the argument that has the expert in the jury may take away the significance of the judges, the prosecutors, the jurors, and the lawyer, who…

In light of the results and limitations of this study, there are several implications for professional development research and practice, and for brokerage theory. First, this study represents a step in understanding how the professional development field is structured. Professional development has received a great deal of research attention, but very little has explored the internal workings of the field itself. Little is known about the organizations and actors involved in professional…

of Wood v The Queen. Lastly, the trial judge also gave biased directions as to how the evidence presented by June Ingham could be utilized. Hence, one of the main issues on appeal in the case were based on the consideration of the significance of expert evidence, and whether the evidence at trial had stood as enough for a…

Being and Information Technology(IT) Consultant Consultants can play a major role in the decision-making process within an organization. Consulting activities are available in just about every facet of organizations and depend heavily on the area of expertise that is required to solve the problem at hand. With this fact in mind, it is important that the consultant does not blindly provide advice for problems that are outside of their areas of expertise doing so could hurt your reputation and…

advantage as a result full and adequate disclosure is of utmost importance. Inadequate disclosure is often regarded as more of a procedural failing, not directly influencing the outcome of the trial, however when it involves the credibility of a witness and their testimony it runs the risk of an unfair trial considerably (Macfarlane, 2006). Likewise in this case, the prosecution failed to disclose prior to the verdict that Mr King had indictable offence charges pending and police had agreed to…

video, R v. Perry and Manitoba (2016), the investigating officer, Constable York, seized four exhibits: a wallet, a Timex watch, a kitchen knife, and a gun replica, which entered into court as physical evidence. Constable York also testified as a key witness, who then had to undergo a cross-examination by the defence counsel. Going into the field of law enforcement, it is important for officers to prepare and follow correct procedures in order to increase their credibility as an officer, and to…

shock. When the judge ask her to tell her qualifications no one believed her simply because she was a woman, however; everyone’s jaws dropped when she started talking in details about the make and model of cars as well as other details that only an expert would know, the shock everyone had would have not happened had she been a…

heavily on that is inconclusive are the call logs. For a six hour period, Jay’s story and the call logs do not match up, and that is hard science (Koenig, “Route Talk”). The state knew that the story didn’t match up, so they only asked the cell tower expert about four that matched at the trial. The state knowingly provided biased, untrue evidence to make it seem like Adnan was the only possibility for the murderer. Because there is no hard evidence to prove that Adnan is the killer, it could be…

In this trial, the question the court is being asked to answer is whether Alex Cooper was responsible for his own injuries. Throughout this trial, the law applied was negligence. Negligence is broken down into four parts: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Due to the nature of this trial as a civil suit, the plaintiff had the burden of proof, meaning the burden to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence. On the night of October 5, 2012, Taylor Hamilton was driving his mother’s…

The behaviour of bystanders, that is people who witnesses an emergency, has been studied by social psychologists in order to gain an understanding of the ways in which people respond to witnessing an event such as a crime, accident or other form of emergency situation taking place. By explaining the key points taken from two case studies which have been used by social scientists to build their arguments about the ways in which bystanders behave, this essay will first give two different examples…