Tate JA in Ryan, “…the proper functioning of government’ in the context of para (f) of subs (4) should [not] be confined to deliberations at the highest level of executive government...rather it] would be prejudiced if information was adduced in evidence that instead related [to government]…[on] construction of s 130(4)(f), the nature of the agency…may be…
Eliza has brought a claim against the ISP alleging that she is a victim of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The basses of Eliza’s claim comes from the fact that the ISP refused to offer her light duty work after she informed them that she was pregnant. In order to prove that one was discriminated against under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, one has to establish the prima facies elements which were set up in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817…
this outcome. This assignment is about analyzing the rhetorical choices and evidences choices made by others. I need to have a good understanding about the correct use of rhetorical choices in order to make just judgement about whether others make effective rhetorical choices or not. In addition, the evidences play an important role in a persuasive paper, so I also need to determine whether the authors choose effective evidences to support their main claims. Through this assignment, I also…
supported. After grappling with my original coding of the transcript, I actually needed to redo that process in order to feel like my ideas were more cohesive. Was it easier or harder to think of supporting evidence for the disproving memo? It was easier for me to think of supporting evidence for the disproving memo because I had already evaluated myself so critically. On Monday, I had written a rough draft of the first memo, but when I revisited those thoughts I deleted most of what I had.…
I have been asked to provide an opinion on whether Donald Drumpf could claim that s 30 of the Commerce Act 1986 has been breached by Ernie Panders and Hilary Linten. To establish a breach two elements must be satisfied. First, there must be a contract, arrangement or understanding between the parties (Hilary and Ernie). Second, there must be a provision thereof which has the purpose of/has/is likely to have the effect of fixing, controlling, or maintaining, or providing for fixing,…
Without more evidence, this mystery will never be solved. There are multiple theories that could explain why Oetzi was killed, but we have no idea which one is actually true. One theory is that he died because he was part of a sacrificial killing. Another common theory is that he was killed because someone was trying to rob him. Lastly, another theory is that he died due to territorial differences. All of these theories have supporting evidence, but some have a more compelling argument than…
His evidence is convincing and relevant when he makes it apparent just how vast the data collection is. The 1.7 billion collected emails, messages, and posts is data that isn’t willingly given through posting on Facebook, Instagram, or Twitter. This is the information…
radio show, I am the biggest fan of Serial. I’d like to begin by saying Adnan shouldn’t be in prison… I mean, other than a missed call, and an idea for a motive, there really isn’t hard evidence to prove that Adnan committed the crime. Let’s start with the ‘The Nisha Call’… one of the most important pieces of evidence. It not only proves that Adnan was with his phone around 3:32pm, it means that Adnan’s story could be a lie. Adnan states, during his interview, that he was without his phone and…
Davy’s Journey Towards Electromagnetism During the early 1800s, scientists made observations that were tested repeatedly and then were seen as fact. Until 1820, electricity and magnetism were believed to be separate branches on the tree of science. Once others believed that idea it became cemented in to the scientific community. However, Humphry Davy was a chemist whose determination and experimentation overturned that idea. Despite obstacles, Oersted’s and Davy‘s experiments changed his peers’…
climate change, drastic changes in the modern economic models are needed. To this end, she makes a good, albeit flawed argument, as although she does provide a plethora of sources for her arguments at times, at others she stops short of providing much evidence for her claims, all the meanwhile going from a neutral tone of language to at times quite obviously biased uses of it. She starts off the article from the perspective of a fish who’s just swam to unfriendly waters…