Duty to retreat

Decent Essays
Improved Essays
Superior Essays
Great Essays
Brilliant Essays
    Page 7 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In respect to how the duties of the teachers are viewed, in reference to tort law, their responsibility is in no way “different than that which rests generally on every member in society” (Seitz, 1971, p. 551), which means that in general, teachers should be vigilante in doing…

    • 1466 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1 The article illustrates how the High Court handled James Hardie’s case, focusing on the legal issues of misleading statement, director’s duties as well as issues regarding continuous disclosure. These issues will be explained with supporting case examples and relevant legal principles. Misleading or deceptive statements “… James Hardie non-executive directors breached Corporate Law by making a misleading statement…” A misleading or deceptive statement can be described as…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    was an existing shareholder in the company. Lastly, the courts must see if it is just and reasonable to establish a duty of care. In this case, we can argue that it is indeed just and reasonable as a special relationship does exist and if the statements were not negligently prepared, damages could be avoided. Therefore, in conclusion of the three-stage test it can establish that a duty is…

    • 2534 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Law Research Paper

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This paper gives a short introduction of tort law and mainly focus on the standard of care, how the courts determining what is the ‘reasonable person’ and whether there are some exceptions to the courts. The law of tort is the law of civil liability for wrongfully injury which provides remedies to individuals harmed by the wrongful conduct of others in order to protect an individual’s private rights. There are two major categories of torts: intentional tort and negligent tort. The general…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    to get the car into a garage before. The brake failure is what caused the car to mount the pavement and therefore leading to the death of Karen. In this case when we ask the same questions as above we find that Lynette did breach her duty of care to Karen by knowingly driving a car with faulty brakes on a public highway. When we apply an objective test “the reasonable man standard” to this case, it could be said that the reasonable man would not have driven the car until it was…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence Act Case Study

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages

    law of TORTS, an offended party must demonstrate that the litigant had a duty to the offended party, the respondent ruptured that obligation by neglecting to comply with the required standard of lead, the defendant's careless direct was the reason for the mischief to the offended…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tort Essay

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages

    four elements to a tort, each of which needs to be present for a remedy to be provided. They are as follows: Duty of Care-For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must owe a legal duty to the victim of the tort. Breach of Duty-For a tort to occur the defendant for an action must have breached the duty that was legally imposed on him. Causation-The breach of the legally imposed duty must have caused damage or injury, whether directly or indirectly to the victim Damage or Injury -There must…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Vicarious Liability

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Student No. 190824 Veg v. Duncan and News Vicarious Liability rest on a special relationship between the tort feasor and the person to whom the tortious conduct is imputed. Here, News may be found vicariously liable for actions of Duncan. Duncan is a reporter for News. News will be, at least, vicarious liable under a Respondent Superior Relationship. the scope of his employment. WRONGFUL INVASION OF PRIVACY Commercial Appropriation. Unauthorized use of plaintiffs name or likeness for a…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    California Vs Murray

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    negligence are: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. The reasonable person standard applies to the defendant, so that the harmful situation can be fixed. The three elements of the reasonable person standard are: likelihood of the occurrence, seriousness of the harm, and the cost to eliminate the harm. The case of California v. Murray (The People of California v. Conrad Robert Murray) will further explain how Negligence is used in court. The first element of negligence is duty, which…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Widget Case Study

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Texas Customer vs. California based Widget Co. Widget Corporation, based in California, and the company President are being sued for damages caused by the installation of their product in Texas by a local handyman hired by Widget Co. Even though the Widget was incorporated in Delaware, California is considered the headquarters because business is conducted from that location. Civil law can generally be divided into two categories: substantive and procedural. Substantive law can be…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Page 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 50